This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Baxter, D.L.M. (1988a): ‘Identity in the Loose and Popular Sense’, Mind 97, 575–582.
Baxter, D.L.M. (1988b): ‘Many One Identity’, Philosophical Papers 17, 193–216.
Leonard, H.S. and N. Goodman (1940): ‘The Calculus of Individuals and Its Uses’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 45–55.
Lewis, D. (1991): Parts of Classes, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Rosenberg, J.F. (1997): ‘Comments on Byeong-uk Yi: “Is MereologyOntologically Innocent?”’, presented in The American Philosophical Association, Pacific Division Meeting (March, 1997).
Tarski, A. (1956): ‘Foundations of the Geometry of Solids’, in his Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, pp. 24–29, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co. (1983), 2nd edition.
van Inwagen, P. (1990): Material Beings, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
van Inwagen, P. (1994): ‘Composition as identity’, in J.E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 8, Logic and Language, pp. 207–220, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
Yi, Byeonguk (1995): Understanding the Many, UCLA Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan: UMI.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yi, BU. Is Mereology Ontologically Innocent?. Philosophical Studies 93, 141–160 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004274912342
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004274912342