Abstract
The biotech revolution profoundly changes and reconstructs the Foucaultian concept of biopolitics from different dimensions. It declares the coming of the Age of Biocapitalism, which opens a new pattern of modern power allocation of life governance and shows people two prospects simultaneously: utopian hopes and dystopian desperation. Biocapitalism has not only produced ethical degeneration and cultural shock, but more importantly, has opened new areas for political hegemony and economic aggression through the reconstruction of biopolitics, and the enhancement of capital’s comprehensive dominance on nature and the human society. Therefore, it has become an area of serious, scholarly research in the biotech era to explore the implications of contemporary biopolitics, to take precautions against, and reduce the real risks of technocapitalism. This paper investigates the new biopolitics supported by the manipulation of modern biotechnology, especially genetic engineering, and unveils the possible hazards and deep contradictions inherent in this capital-controlled science, within the context of biocapitalism. It also seeks ways to prevent technological alienation and to reconstruct political rationality. It argues that entrepreneurs, scientists, companies and universities of developed countries must realize the limits of capital expansion and the self―regulatory capability of the market, and, then, assume ethical responsibilities as biocapital holders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle. The politics, 1253a1–3.
Bishop, J. P., & Jotterand, F. (2006). Bioethics as biopolitics. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 31(3), 205–212.
Brooks, S. (2005). Biotechnology and the politics of truth: from the green revolution to an evergreen revolution. Sociologia Ruralis, 45(4), 360–379.
Cho, J.- H. (2005). Gender and biotechnology in trans/national discourse: The case of Korea, Women’s Worlds 2005: Ninth International Interdisciplinary Congress on Women, June 21, Seoul, South Korea.
Cohen, E. (2006). Biotechnology and the spirit of capitalism. New Atlantis, 12, 9–23.
Cooper, M. (2008). Life as surplus: Biotechnology and capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Engdahl, F. W. (2008). World Bank secret report confirms biofuel cause of world food crisis. Global Research, July 10.
Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punishment: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House, Inc.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage.
Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature, tr. Hella Beister&d William Rehg, Polity.
Haraway, D. (2007). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hawthorne, S. (2004). Wild politics: beyond globalization. Women’s Studies International Forum, 27(3), 243–259.
Helmreich, S. (2008). Species of biocapital. Science as Culture, 17(4), 463–478.
Hui, Y. (2009). Guangming Daily. May 5.
Isla, A. (2007). An ecofeminist perspective on biopiracy in Latin America. Sighs, 32(2), 323–332.
Marx, K. (2007). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. tr. Milligan, Martin. Dover.
Rabinow, P. (1999). Artificiality and enlightenment: From sociobiology to biosociality. In M. Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 407–416). New York: Routledge.http://doctorants.mshparisnord.org/actualite/article.php3?id_article=593 Accessed 29 July, 2008.
Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2006). Thoughts on the concept of biopower today. Biosocieties, 1, 195–217.
Rifkin, J. (2002). Fusion biopolitics. The Nation. February 18, http://www.thenation.com/doc/20020218/rifkin, Accessed 15 Aug, 2008.
Rose, N. (2006). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press.
Salleh, A. (1997). Ecofeminism as politics: Nature, Marx and the postmodern. London: Zed Books. New York: St Martins.
Sharma, N. (2000). One part of an anti-racist feminist political standpoint against biopiracy, National Network on Environments and Women’s Health: Working Paper Series. York University: Toronto, Sept, 113-119
Shenk, D. (1997). Biocapitalism. Harper Magazine, December, 37–45.
Shiva, V. (1998). Monocultures, myths and the masculinisation of agriculture Statement. The International Confer-ence on Women in Agriculture, Director Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology, Washington, June 28–2 July.
Shiva, V. (1999). Stopping biopiracy. ZNet Daily Commentaries, Sept. 6.
Shiva, V. (2005). Earth democracy justice, sustainability, and peace. Cambridge: South End.
Sunder, R. K. (2003). Genomic capital: public cultures and market logics of corporate biotechnology. Science as Culture, 12(1), 87–121.
Sunder, R. K. (2006). Biocapital: The constitution of postgenomic life. Durham: Duke University Press.
Tauli-Corpuz, V. (2001). Biotechnology and indigenous peoples. In B. Tokar (Ed.), Redesigning life: The worldwide challenge to genetic engineering (pp. 252–270). London: Zed Books.
Tauli-Corpuz, V. (2007). Is biopiracy an issue for feminists in the Philippines? Signs, 32, 332–337.
Weber, M. (2002). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. tr. Stephen Kalberg. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, J., Liu, J. The New Biopolitics. J Acad Ethics 7, 287–296 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-009-9098-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-009-9098-8