Skip to main content
Log in

Bi-facial Truth: a Case for Generalized Truth Values

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explore a possibility of generalization of classical truth values by distinguishing between their ontological and epistemic aspects and combining these aspects within a joint semantical framework. The outcome is four generalized classical truth values implemented by Cartesian product of two sets of classical truth values, where each generalized value comprises both ontological and epistemic components. This allows one to define two unary twin connectives that can be called “semi-classical negations”. Each of these negations deals only with one of the above mentioned components, and they may be of use for a logical reconstruction of argumentative reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, A. R., and N. D. Belnap, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. I, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1975.

  2. Anderson, A. R., N. D. Belnap, and J. M. Dunn, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. II, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1992.

  3. Arieli O., Avron A.: Reasoning with logical bilattices. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5, 25–63 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belnap N. D.: Tonk, plonk and plink. Analysis, n.s., 22, 130–134 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belnap, N. D., A useful four-valued logic, in J. M. Dunn and G. Epstein (eds.), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1977, pp. 8–37.

  6. Belnap, N. D., How a computer should think, in G. Ryle (ed.), Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy, Oriel Press, 1977, pp. 30–55.

  7. Buitelaar, P., P. Cimiano, and B. Magnini (eds.), Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2005.

  8. Church, A., Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Vol. I, revised and enlarged edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1956.

  9. Corcoran J.: Aristotle’s Prior Analytics and Boole’s Laws of Thought. History and Philosophy of Logic 24, 261–288 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunn, J. M., The Algebra of Intensional Logics, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Ann Arbor, 1966 (University Microfilms).

  11. Dunn J. M.: Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailment and coupled trees. Philosophical Studies 29, 149–168 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunn, J. M., Relevance logic and entailment, in F. Guenthner and D. Gabbay (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume 3, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1986, pp. 117–24.

  13. Ellis, B., Constructing an ontology, in P. Valore (ed.), Topics on General and Formal Ontology, Polimetrica, International Scientific Publisher, 2005, pp. 15–26.

  14. Ertola R.: On univocal connectives. Logic and Logical Philosophy 18, 5–13 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fitting, M., Bilattices are nice things, in T. Bolander, V. Hendricks, and S. A. Pedersen (eds.), Self-Reference, CSLI-Publications, Stanford, 2006, pp. 53–77.

  16. Frege, G., Function und Begriff, in G. Frege, Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung. Fünf logische Studien, G. Patzig (ed.), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, G¨ottingen, 1986, pp. 18– 39.

  17. Frege, G., Über Sinn und Bedeutung, in Frege, G. Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung. Fünf logische Studien, G. Patzig (ed.), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, G¨ottingen, 1986, pp. 40–65.

  18. Ginsberg, M., Multi-valued logics, in Proceedings of AAAI-86, Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, 1986, pp. 243–247.

  19. Gruber T.: Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43, 907–928 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Łukasiewicz, J., Selected Works, L. Borkowski (ed.), Amsterdam: North-Holland and Warsaw: PWN, 1970.

  21. Malinowski G.: Q-consequence operation. Reports on Mathematical Logic 24, 49–59 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Odintsov S.: On axiomatizing Shramko-Wansing’s logic. Studia Logica 93, 407–428 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shramko Y., Dunn J. M., Takenaka T.: The trilaticce of constructive truth values. Journal of Logic and Computation 11, 761–788 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shramko Y., Wansing H.: Some useful sixteen-valued logics: How a computer network should think. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34, 121–153 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shramko Y., Wansing H.: Hyper-contradictions, generalized truth values and logics of truth and falsehood. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15, 403–424 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shramko, Y., and H.Wansing, Truth values, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition), URL = 〈http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/truth-values/〉.

  27. Shramko, Y., and H. Wansing, Truth and Falsehood. An Inquiry into Generalized Logical Values, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2011.

  28. Smith, B., Ontology, in L. Floridi (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, Blackwell Publishing, 2004, pp. 155–166.

  29. Wansing, H., and Y. Shramko, Harmonious many-valued propositional logics and the logic of computer networks, in C. Dégremont, L. Keiff and H. Rückert (eds.), Dialogues, Logics and Other Strange Things. Essays in Honour of Shahid Rahman, College Publications, 2008, pp. 491–516.

  30. Wansing H., Shramko Y.: Suszko’s thesis, inferential many-valuedness, and the notion of a logical system. Studia Logica 88, 405–429 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Spohn W.: Two-dimensional truth. Studia Philosophica Estonica 1, 194–207 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Suszko R.: The Fregean axiom and Polish mathematical logic in the 1920’s. Studia Logica 36, 373–380 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zaitsev D.: A few more useful 8-valued logics for reasoning with tetralattice EIGHT 4. Studia Logica 92, 265–280 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dmitry Zaitsev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaitsev, D., Shramko, Y. Bi-facial Truth: a Case for Generalized Truth Values. Stud Logica 101, 1299–1318 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-013-9534-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-013-9534-z

Keywords

Navigation