Analyzing Social Policy Argumentation: A case study on the opinion of the German National Ethics Council on an amendment of the Stem Cell Law

Authors

  • Frank Zenker University of Windsor, Ontario

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v30i1.2947

Keywords:

conductive argument, ethical dilemma, human embryonic, political

Abstract

This paper analyzes and evaluates the 2007 majority opinion of the German National Ethics Council which seeks to establish new information (as to the inferior quality of legally procurable human embryonic stem cells) as a sufficient reason for a relaxation of the 2002 Stem Cell Law. A micro-level analysis of the opinion’s central section is conducted and evaluated

 

vis à vis the strongest known opponent position in the national debate at that time. The argumentation is claimed to rely on an unsupported semantic assumption regarding the parthood relation of the 2002 compromise and to misconstrue the strongest known opponent position.

Author Biography

Frank Zenker, University of Windsor, Ontario

Department of Philosophy

Downloads

Published

2010-03-19

Issue

Section

Articles