Skip to main content
Log in

Farm Parents’ Views on their Children’s Labor on Family Farms: A Focus Group Study of Wisconsin Dairy Farmers

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines parents’ perspectives on their children working on their family dairy farms in Wisconsin. The objective of this focus group study is (1) to gain insights on why children work on their family farms, (2) to identify those benefits that parents perceive that they and their children gain from their children working on-farm, (3) to determine the concerns that parents have about their children working, (4) to identify ways to improve the safety of children on family farms, and (5) to understand how US agricultural policy impacts family decisions to use their children’s labor on their farms. The two focus groups reveal that fathers and mothers have different concerns and different perceptions regarding the benefits gained from having their children work on farms. The findings suggest that in response to US agricultural policy, parents are increasingly reliant upon their children’s labor. Children work the longest hours on economically stressed farms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ATFFI (Agricultural Technology and Family Farm Institute) (1996). Grazing in Dairy Land: The Use and Performance of Management IRG among Wisconsin Dairy Farmers. Agricultural Technology and Family Farm Institute (ATFFI) Technical Report No. 5. Madison: University of Wisconsin.

  • CHSICL (Committee on the Health and Safety Implications of Child Labor, National Research Council, and Institute of Medicine (1998). Protecting Youth at Work: Health, Safety, and Development of Working Children and Adolescents in the United States. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

  • DATCP (Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection) (2003). “Number of dairy herds, Wisconsin.” Accessed on October 28, 2003 at http://www.nass.usda.gov/wi/recordbooks/herdbrt.htm.

  • K. A. DeBarr D. O. Ritzel W. R. Wright M. J. Kittleson (1998) ArticleTitle“Friends and family: Implications for youth tractor safety” Journal of Safety Research 29 IssueID2 87–95 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-4375(98)00005-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Eisenhauer W. E. Saupe (1994) Status of Wisconsin Farming, Special Edition: The 1993 ATFFI Family Farm Survey Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics and Agricultural Technology and Family Farm Institute, University of Wisconsin Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Evans (Eds) (1992) Statistics, Gender and Development Routledge London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • J. J. Goodnow P. M. Warton (1991) ArticleTitle“The social bases of social cognition: Interactions about work and their implications” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 37 IssueID1 27–58

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Greenberger L. Steinberg (1986) When Teenagers Work: The Psychological and Social Costs of Adolescent Employment Basic Books New York, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Grusec J. J. Goodnow L. Cohen (1996) ArticleTitle“Household work and the development of concern for others” Developmental Psychology 32 IssueID6 999–1007 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0012-1649.32.6.999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. G. Haney J. B. Knowles (1988) Women and Farming: Changing Roles, Changing Structures Westview Press Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Hawks J. Gay K. J. Donham (1991) ArticleTitle“Rural youth disability prevention project survey: Results from 169 Iowa farm families” The Journal of Rural Health 7 IssueID2 170–179

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kim L. Zepeda (2004a) ArticleTitle“Factors affecting children’s participation and amount of labor on family farms” Journal of Safety Research 35 IssueID4 391–401 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jsr.2004.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Kim L. Zepeda (2004b) ArticleTitle“When the work is never done: Time allocation in US family farm households” Feminist Economics 10 IssueID1 115–139 Occurrence Handle10.1080/1354570042000198254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. A. Krueger (1994) Focus Group: A Practical Guide for Applied Research Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, California

    Google Scholar 

  • H. K. Light D. Hertsgaard R. E. Martin (1985) ArticleTitle“Farm children’s work in the family” Adolescence 20 IssueID78 425–432

    Google Scholar 

  • A. C. Meares (1997) ArticleTitle“Making the transition from conventional to sustainable agriculture: Gender, social movement participation, and quality of life on family farm” Rural Sociology 62 IssueID1 21–47

    Google Scholar 

  • NCCRAHS (National Children’s Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety) (1999). “Brief summary of public policy relating to childhood agricultural labor.” Accessed on October 27, 2003 at http://research.Marshfieldclinic.org/children/Resources/Agriculture/PublicPolicy.htm.

  • T. G. Pierson D. J. Murphy (1996) ArticleTitle“Safety and health educational needs of agricultural education and industry professionals” Journal of Safety Research 27 IssueID2 103–116 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-4375(96)00004-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. T. Rickson P. L. Daniels (1999) ArticleTitle“Rural women and decision making: Women’s role in resource management during rural restructuring” Rural Sociology 64 IssueID2 234–250

    Google Scholar 

  • F. P. Rivara (1997) ArticleTitle“Fatal and nonfatal farm injuries to children and adolescents in the U.S 1990–1993” Injury Prevention 3 190–194

    Google Scholar 

  • R. A. Rosenfeld (1985) Farm Women: Work, Farm, and Family in the United States The University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • W. E. Saupe S. Bentley (1994) Status of Wisconsin Farming-Special Edition: The 1993 ATFFI Family Farm Survey Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics and Agricultural Technology and Family Farm Institute. University of Wisconsin Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Skjolaas (1996) Children, Parents Take Advantage of Safety Course. Press Release Agricultural Engineering Department, University of Wisconsin Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Zepeda M. Castillo (1997) ArticleTitle“The role of husbands and wives in farm technology choice” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 IssueID2 583–588

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Zepeda M. Goodale C. Lay K. McSweeney D. Undersander (1997) ArticleTitle“The results of four Wisconsin focus groups: Roles of husbands and wives in farm decisions” Review of Agricultural Economics 19 IssueID2 291–307

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lydia Zepeda.

Additional information

Lydia Zepeda is a fellow of the Center for World Affairs and the Global Economy and professor of Consumer Science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She earned her MS and PhD in Agricultural Economics at the University of California at Davis. Her research interests include agricultural technology adoption, risk perceptions, household decision-making, and consumer food demand.

Jongsoog Kim is a research fellow at Korea Women’s Development Institute in Seoul, Korea. She earned her PhD in Human Ecology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her research interests include gender economics, labor supply of women and children, intrahousehold resource allocation, and consumer policies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zepeda, L., Kim, J. Farm Parents’ Views on their Children’s Labor on Family Farms: A Focus Group Study of Wisconsin Dairy Farmers. Agric Hum Values 23, 109–121 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-004-5873-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-004-5873-8

Keywords

Navigation