Abstract
Incorporation of the behavioral issues of the decision maker (DM) is among the aspects that each Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) method implicitly or explicitly takes into account. As postulated by regret theory, the feelings of regret and rejoice are among the behavioral issues associated with the entire decision making process. Within the context of MCDM, the DM may feel regret, when the chosen alternative is compared with another one having at least one better criterion value. PROMETHEE II is a widely known MCDM method that makes no explicit incorporation of regret attitude of the DM. In this paper, we elaborate on the applicability of regret theory to MCDM context. In particular, we investigate the findings of regret theory and explore the parallel between regret theory and PROMETHEE II method. Relying on the concepts of regret theory, we demonstrate how a decision that is made using a PROMETHEE II based outranking method conforms to the regret attitude of the DM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acker M.H. (1997) Tempered regrets under total ignorance. Theory and Decision 42: 207–213
Ahn B.S., Park K.S., Han C.H., Kim J.K. (2000) Multi-attribute decision aid under incomplete information and hierarchical structure. European Journal of Operational Research 125: 431–439
Bell D.E. (1982) Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research 30(4): 961–981
Belton V., Stewart T.J. (2002) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Kluwer, Boston
Brans J.P., Vincke Ph. (1985) A preference ranking organization method. Management Science 31: 647–656
Carrizosa E., Conde E., Fernandez F.R., Puerto J. (1995) Multi-criteria analysis with partial information about the weighting coefficients. European Journal of Operational Research 81: 291–301
Connolly T., Ordonez L.D., Coughlan R. (1997) Regret and responsibility in the evaluation of decision outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70(1): 73–85
Creyer E.H., Ross W.T. (1999) The development and use of a regret experience measure to examine the effects of outcome feedback on regret and subsequent choice. Marketing Letters, 10(4): 379–392
Dias L.C., Clímaco J.N. (2002) Exploring the consequences of imprecise information in choice problems using ELECTRE. In: Bouyssou D., Jacquet-Lagrèze E., Perny P., Slowinski R., Vanderpooten D., Vincke Ph. (eds). Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria-Essays in Honor of Bernard Roy. Kluwer: Boston, pp. 175–193
Financial Times, (2007a), Financial Times MBA 2007, The top 100 full-time global MBA programmes, available at URL: http://media.ft.com/businesseducation/pdf/table_mba.pdf
Financial Times, (2007b), The Financial Times MBA 2007 rankings, Table Key, available at URL: http://media.ft.com/businesseducation/pdf/table_key_mba.pdf
Gilovich T., Medvec V.H. (1995) The experience of regret: what, when, and why. Psychological Review 102: 379–395
Inman J.J., Dyer J.S., Jia J. (1997) A generalized utility model of disappointment and regret effects on post-choice valuation. Marketing Science 16: 97–111
Keeny R.L., Raiffa H. (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley: New York
Kirkwood C.W., SarinR.K. (1985) Ranking with partial information: a method and an application. Operations Research 33(1): 38–48
Korhonen P., Wallenius J. (1997) Behavioral issues in MCDM: Neglected research questions. In: Climaco J. (eds). Multicriteria Analysis, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on MCDM. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, pp. 412–422
Lee K.S., Park K.S., Eum Y.S., Park K. (2001) Extended methods for identifying dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise information. European Journal of Operational Research 134: 557–563
Loomes G., Sugden R. (1982) Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal 92: 805–824
Loomes G., Sugden R. (1987) Some implications of a more general form of regret theory. Journal of Economic Theory 41: 270–287
Malakooti B. (1989) Identifying nondominated alternatives with partial information for multiple-objective discrete and linear programming problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 19(1): 95–107
Mareschal B., Brans J.P. (1988) Geometrical representations for MCDA. European Journal of Operational Research 34: 69–77
Mareschal B., Brans J.P. (1995) The PROMETHEE VI procedure: how to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. Journal of Decision Systems 4: 213–223
Marmol A.M., Puerto J., Fernandez F.R. (2002) Sequential incorporation of imprecise information in multiple criteria decision processes. European Journal of Operational Research 137: 123–133
Miettinen K., Salminen P. (1999) Decision-aid for discrete multiple criteria decision making problems with imprecise data. European Journal of Operational Research 119: 50–60
Özerol, G., Karasakal E. (2007) Interactive outranking approaches for multicriteria decision making problems with imprecise Information, Journal of the Operational Research Society (in press).
Park K.S., Kim S.H. (1997) Tools for interactive multi-attribute decisionmaking with incompletely identified information. European Journal of Operational Research 98: 111–123
Pomerol J.C., Barba-Romero S. (2000) Multicriteria Decision in Management, Principles and Practice. Kluwer: Boston
Roy B. (1991) The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision 31: 49–73
Saaty T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill: New York
Sugden R. (1993) An axiomatic foundation for regret theory. Journal of Economic Theory 60: 159–180
Tsiros M. (1998). Effect of regret on post-choice valuation: the case of more than two alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76(1): 48–69
Tsiros M., Mittal V. (2000) Regret: a model of its antecedents and consequences in consumer decision making. The Journal of Consumer Research 26(4): 401–417
Vincke Ph. (1992) Multicriteria Decision-Aid. Wiley: Chichester
Weber M. (1985) A method for multiattribute decision making with incomplete information. Management Science 31: 1365–1371
Zeelenberg M. (1999a) Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12: 93–106
Zeelenberg M. (1999b) The use of crying over spilled milk: a note on the rationality and functionality of regret. Philosophical Psychology 12(3): 325–340
Zeelenberg M., Pieters R. (2004) Consequences of risk aversion in real life: the case of the Dutch postcode lottery. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 93: 155–168
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Özerol, G., Karasakal, E. A Parallel between Regret Theory and Outranking Methods for Multicriteria Decision Making Under Imprecise Information. Theory Decis 65, 45–70 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9074-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9074-y