Skip to main content
Log in

Cut-Rule Axiomatization of the Syntactic Calculus NL0

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An axiomatics of the product-free syntactic calculus L ofLambek has been presented whose only rule is the cut rule. It was alsoproved that there is no finite axiomatics of that kind. The proofs weresubsequently simplified. Analogous results for the nonassociativevariant NL of L were obtained by Kandulski. InLambek's original version of the calculus, sequent antecedents arerequired to be nonempty. By removing this restriction, we obtain theextensions L 0 and NL 0 ofL and NL, respectively. Later, the finiteaxiomatization problem for L 0 andNL 0 was partially solved, viz., for formulas withoutleft (or, equivalently, right) division and an (infinite) cut-ruleaxiomatics for the whole of L 0 has been given. Thepresent paper yields an analogous axiomatics forNL 0. Like in the author's previous work, the notionof rank of an axiom is introduced which, although inessentialfor the results given below, may be useful for the expectednonfinite-axiomatizability proof.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buszkowski, W., 1987, “The logic of types,” pp. 213-221 in Initiatives in Logic, J. Srzednicki, ed., The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, H., 1993, Studied Flexibility: Categories and Types in Syntax and Semantics. ILLC Dissertation Series 1993-1995, Amsterdam: ILLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, T., 1991, “On properties of the Zielonka-Lambek calculus,” pp. 303-308 in Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium, P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, eds., Amsterdam: ILLC, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandulski, M., 1988, “The non-associative Lambek calculus,” pp. 141-151 in Categorial Grammars, W. Buszkowski, W. Marciszewski, and J. van Benthem, eds., Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J., 1958, “The mathematics of sentence structure,” American Mathematical Monthly 65, 154-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J., 1961, “On the calculus of syntactic types,” pp. 166-178 in Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects, R. Jakobson, ed., Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, M., 1988, Categorial Investigations: Logical and Linguistic Aspects of the Lambek Calculus, Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J., 1991, Language in Action: Categories, Lambdas and Dynamic Logic, Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielonka, W., 1981, “Axiomatizability of Ajdukiewicz-Lambek calculus by means of cancellation schemes,” Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 27, 215-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielonka, W., 1988, “Cut-rule axiomatization of product-free Lambek calculus with the empty string,” Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 34, 135-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielonka, W., 1989, “A simple and general method of solving the finite axiomatizability problems for Lambek' syntactic calculi,” Studia Logica 48, 35-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielonka, W., 1990, “Linear axiomatics of commutative product-free Lambek calculus,” Studia Logica 49, 515-522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielonka, W., 1997, “More about the axiomatics of the Lambek calculus,” pp. 319-324 in Euphony and Logos. Essays in Honour of Maria Steffen-Batóg and Tadeusz Batóg, R. Murawski and J. Pogonowski, eds., Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zielonka, W. Cut-Rule Axiomatization of the Syntactic Calculus NL0. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9, 339–352 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008309805070

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008309805070

Navigation