Abstract
This paper focuses on two passages of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, one in Z 3, the other in H1, in which Aristotle seems to assert that the hupokeimenon is said in three ways, as matter, form, and the compound of matter and form. From these two passages it is often said that subjecthood is a criterion for being substance (alongside two other criteria, separateness and being a tode ti). A consequence of this is that, if form is to be substance, and form is substance, namely first substance, it has to comply with the subject-criterion. This paper challenges this reading, purporting to show that these two passages need not commit Aristotle to the subject-criterion, and that there are good reasons not to commit him to it.
Ackrill, J. Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione. Clarendon Press 1963.10.1093/actrade/9780198720867.book.1Search in Google Scholar
Baghdassarian, F. Aristote : Métaphysique H 5 – la génération des contraires et la matière, Elenchos 35 2014, 61–88.Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, J. Aristotle’s Concept of Mind, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72 1971–72, pp. 101–10.10.1093/aristotelian/72.1.101Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press, 2 vols, 1984.10.1515/9781400835850Search in Google Scholar
Boehm, R. Das Grundlegende und das Wesentliche – zu Aristoteles’ Abhandlung ‘Über das Sein und das Seiende’ (Metaphysik Z), Martinus Nijhoff 1965.10.1007/978-94-015-1337-1Search in Google Scholar
Bonitz, H. Commentarius in Aristotelis Metaphysicam. Georg Olms 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Buhle, J. T. Aristotelis Opera Omnia Graece. Biponti 1791.Search in Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. A Map of Metaphysics Zeta, Pittsburgh 2001.Search in Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. et alii. Notes on Z. Oxford 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Detel, Wolfgang. Aristoteles – Metaphysik Bücher VII und VIII. Suhrkamp 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Frede, M. and Patzig, G. Aristoteles Metaphysik Z. Verlag C. H. Beck, 2 vols., 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Frede, M. Essays in Ancient Philosophy. University of Minnesota Press, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Gill, M.-L. Aristotle on Substance – the paradox of unity. Princeton University Press, 1989.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, Frank. How Aristotle gets by in Metaphysics Zeta, Oxford University Press 2013.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664016.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mittelmann, J. Le Noyau et le Fondement, Journal of Ancient Philosophy 2019 suppl. vol. pp. 54–71.10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v1iSupplementp54-71Search in Google Scholar
Morel, P.-M. Aristote – Métaphysique Eta, Vrin 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, D. W. D. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Clarendon Press, 2 vols., 1924.10.1093/oseo/instance.00263632Search in Google Scholar
Seminara, S. Matter and Explanation: on Aristotle’s Metaphysics Book H (Thesis ENS Lyon and Roma Tre, 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Shields, C. Aristotle De Anima. Clarendon Press 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Shields, C. Soul as Subject in Aristotle’s De Anima, Classical Quarterly 38 1988, pp. 140–149.10.1017/S0009838800031359Search in Google Scholar
Wolff, F. Qu’est-ce que se demander ce qu’est la réalité? in M. Narcy and A. Tordesillas, La Métaphysique d’Aristote, Vrin / Ousia 2005, pp. 145–169.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
