Skip to main content
Log in

Hope and Resistance in Lyotard’s Concept of Infancy

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article I wish to defend hope by arguing that it is a child-like predisposition and that its strength and uniqueness stem exactly from its naïve, infantilizing character. To discuss the concepts of hope and of childhood and the relationship between them, I read in Kazuo Ishiguro’s latest book – Klara and the Sun (2021), using Lyotard’s concepts of the inhuman, development, and infancy (1991, 1998). I argue for an alternative approach to childhood, in which it is not viewed merely as a basic developmental phase or as a lack in maturity but as an irreducible and potent element in human life, further showing that when understood as an event, childhood can be a strong basis for hope, and as such should be recognized by educators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this essay I intentionally refrain from discussing historical accounts of the concept of ‘childhood.’ While there is a vast body of literature on this important topic (Aries 1960; Fass 2013), I follow here Lyotard’s approach to infancy and childhood that is largely ahistorical and ignores specific temporal expressions of the phenomenon.

References

  • Aries, Phillip. 1960. Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. Vintage.

  • Bovens, Luc. 1999. The value of hope. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3): 667–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camus, Albert. 1965. [1942]. In The myth of Sisyphus, and other essays. London: Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon, Pradeep, and Paul Standish, eds. 2013. Lyotard: just education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eherenreich, Barbara. 2010. Bright-sided: how positive thinking is undermining America. New York: Picador Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fass, Paula S. 2013. The Routledge history of childhood in the western world. Routledge.

  • Ford, Derek. 2021. Inhuman Educations Jean-François Lyotard, Pedagogy, Thought. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill. 2021.

  • Ishiguro, Kazuo. 2021. Klara and the Sun. London: Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1784 [1959]. What is Enlightenment? Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals and What is Enlightenment, tr. by L. W. Beck, New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1959.

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1781 [1998]. Critique of Pure Reason P. Guyer and A.W. Wood (transl. and eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Katz, Cindi. 2004. Growing up Global: Economic Restructuring and Children’s everyday lives. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean F. 1991. The inhuman: reflections on time. G. Bennington & R. Bowlby, Trans. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean F. 1997. Postmodern fables. G. Van Den Abbeele, Trans. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean F. Return upon the return. 1999. Toward the postmodern Robert Harvey and Mark S. Roberts trans. and eds. 192–206.

  • Lyotard, Jean. F. 1992. Voices of a voice. G Van Den Abbeele Trans Discourse 14 (1): 126–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean F. 1999. The survivor. In Toward the Postmodern. Robert Harvey and Mark S. Roberts trans. And eds, 144–163. New York: Humanity books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, Gabriel. 1951. [1962]. In Homo Viator: introduction to a Metaphysic of Hope. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Adrienne M. 2014. How we hope: a moral psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedreich. 1910. Human, all too human. H. Zimmern (Trans.). Edinburgh: T.N. Foulis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuyen, A. T. 1997. Education for imaginative knowledge. Journal of Thought 32: 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo-Liu, David. 2000. Fables and apedagogy: Lyotard’s relevance for a pedagogy of the other. In Lyotard: just education. Dhillon, eds. P. A., & P. Standish, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, Philip. 2004. Hope and its place in mind. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 592 (1): 152–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. 2004. Who is the subject of the Rights of Man? The South Atlantic Quarterly 103: 2/3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, Barbara. 2003. The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeyers, Paul, and Jan Masschelein. 2013. L’enfance, education and the politics of meaning. In Lyotard: just education, eds. P. Dhillon, and P. Standish, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberg Steven. 2001. A.I. Artificial intelligence. Warner bros.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oded Zipory.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest Statement

not aplicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zipory, O. Hope and Resistance in Lyotard’s Concept of Infancy. Stud Philos Educ 42, 247–259 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-023-09872-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-023-09872-w

Keywords

Navigation