Skip to main content
Log in

Gender and property rights in the commons: Examples of water rights in South Asia

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many countries and resource sectors, the state is devolving responsibility for natural resource management responsibility to ``communities'' or local user groups. However, both policymakers and researchers in this area have tended to ignore the implications of gender and other forms of intra-community power differences for the effectiveness and equity of natural resource management. In the irrigation sector, despite the rhetoric on women's participation, a review of evidence from South Asia shows that organizations often exclude women through formal or informal membership rules and practices. Women may have other ways to obtain irrigation services, but even if they are effective, these other informal ways of obtaining irrigation services are typically less secure. As resource management – and rights to resources – are transferred from the state to local organizations, ensuring women's participation is essential for gender equity in control over resources. Greater involvement of women can also strengthen the effectiveness of local organizations by improving women's compliance with rules and maintenance contributions. Further detailed and comparative research is required to identify the major factors that affect women's participation and control over resources, if devolution policies are to be both equitable and sustainable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, B. (1992). “The gender and environment debate: Lessons from India.” Feminist Studies 18(1): 119-158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, B. (1994). A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, B. (1997a). ‘Bargaining’ and Gender Relations: Within and beyond the Household. Washington, DC: IFPRI FCND Discussion Paper #27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, B. (1997b). “Environmental action, gender equity and women's participation.” Development and Change 28: 1-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. and C. C. Gibson (1999). “Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation.” World Development 27(4): 629-649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahluwalia, M. (1997). “Representing communities: The case of a community-based watershed management project in Rajasthan, India.” IDS Bulletin 28(4): 23-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backer, S. (1992). “Promotional action to incorporate the gender dimension into selected mainstream projects in South Asia.” Women in Development (WID) Study for the Nepal SPWP. Kathmandu: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, M., R. Barker, R. S. Meinzen-Dick, and F. Konransen (eds.) (1999). Multiple Uses of Water in Irrigated Areas: A Case Study from Sri Lanka. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI, SWIM Report 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baland, J-M. and J-P. Platteau (1996). Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benda-Beckmann, K., M. de Bruijn, H. van Dijk, G. Hesseling, B. van Koppen, and L. Res (1997). Rights of Women to the Natural Resources Land and Water. The Hague: Netherlands Development Assistance, Development Cooperation Information Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Working Paper No. 2, Women and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. (1991). Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. (ed.) (1992). Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice and Policy. San Francisco, California: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruins, B. and A. Heijmans (1993). Gender Biases in Irrigation Projects. Gender Considerations in the Rehabilitation of Bauraha Irrigation System in the District of Dang, Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: SNV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dankelman I. and J. Davidson (1988). Women and Environment in the Third World: Alliance for the Future. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere, C. D. and M. de Leon (1997). “Women, land rights and the Latin American Counter-Reforms.” Paper prepared for presentation at the XX International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA), April 17–19. Guadalajara, Mexico.

  • Haddad, L., J. Hoddinott, and H. Alderman (1994). Intrahousehold Resource Allocation: An Overview. Washington DC: World Bank, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hombergh, H. van den. (1993). Gender, Environment and Development. A Guide to the Literature. Amsterdam: INDRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Conference on Water and the Environment (1992). “Development issues for the 21st century. The Dublin Statement Report of the Conference.” ICWE Conference, January 26–31. Dublin, Ireland.

  • Jackson, C. (1993a). “Doing what comes naturally? Women and environment in development.” World Development 21(12): 1947-1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. (1993b). “Women/Nature or gender/history? A Critique of ecofeminist ‘development’.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 20(3): 389-419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. (1997). “Gender, irrigation and environment: Arguing for agency.” In D. Merrey and S. Bhaviskar (eds.), Gender Analysis and Reform of Irrigation Management: Concepts, Cases, and Gaps in Knowledge. Proceedings of the Workshop on Women and Water, September 15–19. Habarana, Sri Lanka (pp. 24-43). Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jodha, N. S. (1990). “Common property resources: Contributions and crisis.” Economic and Political Weekly, June 30, A65-A78.

  • Jordans, E. H. and M. Z. Zwarteveen (1997). A Well of One's Own. Gender analysis of an Irrigation Program in Bangladesh. Colombo, Sri Lanka: HMI, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, D. and D. Seckler (1982). “Sukhomajri: Water management in India.” The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists 38(3): 26-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. (1991). Gender, Production, and Well-Being: Rethinking the Household Economy. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, IDS Discussion Paper DP 288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kome, A. (1997). Gender and Irrigation Management Transfer in Sri Lanka, IRMU, ID and HMI. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W. F. (1998). Governing Irrigation Systems in Nepal: Institutions, Infrastructure, and Collective Action. Oakland, California: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W. F., M. Lee, and E. Ostrom (1993). An Institutional Analysis of Irrigation Performance in Nepal. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lastarria-Cornhiel, S. (1997). “Impact of privatization on gender and property rights in Africa.” World Development 25(8): 1317-1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M. (1992). “Gender and the environment: Traps and opportunities.” Development in Practice 2(1): 12-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M., R. Mearns, and I. Scoones (1997a). “Challenges to community-based sustainable development: Dynamics, entitlements, institutions.” IDS Bulletin 28(4): 4-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M., R. Mearns, and I. Scoones (1997b). “Institutions, consensus and conflict: Implications for policy and practice.” IDS Bulletin 28(4): 90-95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, B. D. (1985). Community Participation and Local Organization for Small-Scale Irrigation. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University, Water Management Synthesis Project (WMS), Report No. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabry, J. B. and D. A. Cleveland (1996). “The relevance of indigenous irrigation: A comparative analysis of sustainability,” in J. B. Mabry (ed.), Canals and Communities. Small-Scale Irrigation Systems (pp. 227-260). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggs, P. and J. Hoddinott (1997). The Impact of Change in Common Property Resource Management on Intra-Household Allocation. Washington, DC: IFPRI FCND Discussion Paper No. 34.

  • McCulloch, A. K., R. Meinzen-Dick, and P. Hazell (1998). Property Rights, Collective Action, and Technologies for Natural Resource Management: A Conceptual Framework. Washington, DC: CGIAR System-Wide Program on Property Rights and Collective Action, SP-PRCA Working Paper No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick, R. S. and M. Bakker (1999). “Water rights and multiple water uses: framework and application to Kirindi Oya irrigation system, Sri Lanka.” Paper presented at 6th Biennial Meeting of the International Water and Resource Economics Consortium, June 29–July 2. Waikoloa, Hawaii

  • Meinzen-Dick, R. S. and M. Zwarteveen (1998). “Gendered participation in water management: Issues and illustrations from water users' associations in South Asia.” Agriculture and Human Values 15(4): 337-345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick, R. S., L. R. Brown, H. S. Feldstein, and A. R. Quisumbing (1997). “Gender, property rights and natural resources.” World Development 25(8): 1303-1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D. (1995). “Local institutions and power: The history and practice of community management of tank irrigation systems in South India,” in N. Nelson and S. Wright (eds.), Power and Participatory Development. Theory and Practice (pp. 144-155). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, N. C. (1989). “Gender participation in irrigation system activities in the hills of Nepal,” in Proceedings of second annual workshop on Women in Farming Systems, September 27–29. Kathmandu, Nepal: Inštitute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Rampur, Chitwan/USAID, 49-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, R. and U. Pradhan (2000). “Negotiating access and rights: Disputes over rights to an irrigation water source in Nepal,” in B. Bruns and R. S. Meinzen-Dick (eds.), Negotiating Water Rights. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, S. (1998). “Fairness, social capital and the commons: The societal foundations of collective action in the Himalaya,” in M. Goldman (ed.), Privatizing Nature. Political Struggles for the Global Commons (pp. 167-197). London: Pluto Press, in Association with Transnational Institute (TNI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (1993). “Common property, equality and development.” World Development 21(7): 1123-1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quisumbing, A. R., L. R. Brown, H. Sims Feldstein, L, Haddad, and C. Peña, (1995). Women: The Key to Food Security. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, Food Policy Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raby, N. (1991). “Participatory management in large irrigation systems: Issues for consideration.” World Development 19(12): 1767-1776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risseeuw, C. (1988). The Fish Don't Talk about the Water: Gender Transformation, Power and Resistance among Women in Sri Lanka. Leiden, The Netherlands: E. J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, D. and D. Edmunds (1997). “Women, men and trees: Gender, power, and property in forest and agrarian landscape.” World Development 25(8): 1351-1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, D., B. Thomas-Slayter, and E. Wangari (eds.) (1996). Feminist Political Ecology. Global Issues and Local Experiences. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarin, M. (1998). “Community forest management: Whose participation.” In I. Guijt and M. K. Shah (eds.), The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development (pp. 121-130). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager, E. and E. Ostrom (1992). “Property rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis.” Land Economics 68(3): 249-262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (1989). Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London: ZED Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff, N. (1986). Getting the Process Right: Improving Irrigation and Water Management with Farmer Organizations and Participation. Boulder and London: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Koppen, B. (1998). More Jobs per Drop: Targeting Irrigation to Poor Women and Men. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ommering, A. (1991). Women in the Irrigation Line of Credit Project Areas. Kathmandu: 1991 Interim Report.

  • Vermillion, D. (1996). The Privatization and Self-Management of Irrigation. Colombo, Sri Lanka: HMI Final Report.

  • Wade, R. (1987). “The management of common property resources: Finding a cooperative solution.” World Bank Research Observer 2(2): 219-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, R. (1994). Locally-Managed Irrigation Systems: Essential Tasks and Implications for Assistance, Management Transfer and Turnover Programs. Colombo, Sri Lanka: HMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, R. and E. Martin (1998). “Water rights and equity issues. A case from Nepal,” in R. Boelens and G. Dávila (eds.), Searching for Equity. Conceptions of Justice and Equity in Peasant Irrigation (pp. 133-142). Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarteveen, M. (1994). Gender Issues, Water Issues. A gender Perspective to Irrigation Management. Colombo, Sri Lanka: HMI Working Paper No. 32.

  • Zwarteveen, M. (1997). “Water: From basic need to commodity. A discussion on gender and water rights in the context of irrigation.” World Development 25(8): 1335-1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwarteveen, M. and N. Neupane (1996). Free-Riders or Victims: Women's Nonparticipation in Irrigation Management in Nepal's Chhattis Mauja Irrigation Scheme. Colombo, Sri Lanka: HMI Research Report No. 7.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zwarteveen, M., Meinzen-Dick, R. Gender and property rights in the commons: Examples of water rights in South Asia. Agriculture and Human Values 18, 11–25 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007677317899

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007677317899

Navigation