From PhilPapers forum PhilPapers Surveys:

2009-12-09
Eye-openers in the Survey results?
Reply to Max Kölbel
Hi Max. That makes sense!  I would just have thought that it would be obvious to treat some moral judgments as affective states.  Recall when Lecter in Hannibal cuts out a piece of the fully conscious Krendler's brain (after opening his skull), sautees it and feeds it to Krendler?  That still induces a strong negative reaction in me.  My initial negative reaction is clearly an affective state.  The belief that this is wrong comes later.  I would say that the affective state is a basic moral judgment.  But maybe the consensus among cognitivists is that those affective states are not moral judgments.