Carl,
Three things:
1)This is not 1965.
2)Philosophy is not a leisure time activity, not in the sense that you employ either leisure or "philosophy."
Socrates was stern: Philosophy requires leisure.  But, by this he meant that the Philosopher must not be tied to the outcome of his inquiry in such a way as to steer it away from its natural ends and toward his own self-interest.
Gadfly that he was (irritant to the numb-founded masses and entitled leaders and elites who corrupted his society even as ours is, today), and as sleepy as Nebraska is, I am not surprised that you have mistaken the two senses of leisure, or the purpose of Philsophy, for the same reasons.
3)Oxytocin I enjoy in large amounts, frankly, and do not in the least require a "hug," least of all from some armchair cornerback.  Pursue at leisure whatever you like.  Leave the future of Philosophy, and of the world for that matter, to persons who take the issue seriously.