From PhilPapers forum Continental Philosophy:

2009-05-05
The analytic/continental divide
In part I think we are in agreement, Torbjorn. I agree there is no future in both sides dismissing each other by name-calling, and it would be nice, as you say, if both would learn from each other.  But does it look like happening?  I see very little sign of it. 

Are the differences between the two camps substantial?  Until there's a more determined attempt at dialogue I guess we won't really know (though I suspect the answer is yes). The hard fact is that dialogue is almost non-existent. I mentioned the little book by Simon Critchley which was one attempt (though with limited success, I felt). How many others have tried?  It is passing strange, surely, that philosophers, who pride themselves on being able to solve intellectual problems, don't devote more time to one as conspicuous as this.