My philosophical views

The answers shown here are not necessarily the same provided as part of the 2009 PhilPapers Survey. These answers can be updated at any time.

See also:

QuestionAnswerComments
A priori knowledge: yes or no?Accept: no
Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Aesthetic value: objective or subjective?Accept both
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism?Lean toward: idealismidealism in that sense that I see the essential importance of spirituality, though not a spiritual realm in dualism with the physical realm.
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will?Lean toward: libertarianism
God: theism or atheism?Accept: theism
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism?Accept an intermediate view
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism?Accept: contextualism
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Logic: classical or non-classical?Accept: classicalAristotelian logic
Mental content: internalism or externalism?Reject both
Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism?Reject bothsubject and object are co-evolving and mutually dependent on each other. Human mind and spirit is a microcosm of the macrocosmic World.
Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism?Reject bothTo answer that question one has to answer how many dimensions there are in Cosmos. An infinite number, because spirit is eternal and infinite. So natural and supernatural forces are not the only forces in Cosmos.
Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism?Reject bothNeural activity emerges from the mind and not opposite way around. Mind is the dynamics of the interplay between spirit and soul, and spirit and body respectively. When there is more reciprocation between spirit and soul in relation to the that of spirit and body, there is more activity in the right side of the brain in relation to the movement in the left side, and vice versa.
Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes?Othermeaningless thought experiment.
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics?Accept: virtue ethics
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view?Lean toward: psychological viewecopsychological
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism?Accept an intermediate view
Proper names: Fregean or Millian?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Time: A-theory or B-theory?Otheraccept eternalism
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch?OtherIt´s only hypothetical. In real Life you have to listen to your heart.
Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic?Accept: correspondenceAristotelian view
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible?Accept: inconceivable