My philosophical views

The answers shown here are not necessarily the same provided as part of the 2009 PhilPapers Survey. These answers can be updated at any time.

See also:

A priori knowledge: yes or no?The question is too unclear to answer
Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Aesthetic value: objective or subjective?Lean toward: objective
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no?Accept: yes
Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism?Lean toward: internalism
External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism?Accept: non-skeptical realism
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will?Accept: compatibilism
God: theism or atheism?Lean toward: atheism
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism?The question is too unclear to answerFormerly, I answered that I lean toward empiricism. But on further thought, I think the question is too unclear to answer. I don't know, for example, if the choice is between classical empiricism / rationalism -- insofar as there is such a thing, as opposed to "Locke's empiricism" (or Berkeley's or Hume's) or "Descartes' rationalism" (or Spinoza's or Leibniz's) -- or some modernization. And if a modernization, which one. Carnap's, Quine's, van Fraassen's? I definitely resonate with Peirce's assertion: "The elements of every concept enter into logical thought at the gate of perception and make their exit at the gate of purposive action; and whatever cannot show its passports at both those two gates is to be arrested as unauthorized by reason." But a lot rides here on what is meant by "logical" and a lot of processing goes on in between those gates.
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean?There is no fact of the matter
Logic: classical or non-classical?Lean toward: non-classical
Mental content: internalism or externalism?Lean toward: externalism
Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism?Lean toward: moral realism
Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism?Lean toward: naturalism
Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism?Lean toward: physicalism
Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism?Lean toward: cognitivism
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes?The question is too unclear to answer
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics?Reject one, undecided between others
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory?Lean toward: representationalism
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view?Lean toward: psychological viewI worry that there is ultimately no fact of the matter here.
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism?Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Proper names: Fregean or Millian?Lean toward: Millian
Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism?Lean toward: scientific realism
Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death?Lean toward: survival
Time: A-theory or B-theory?Lean toward: B-theory
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch?Accept: switch
Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic?Accept: epistemicMy theory of truth is roughly that of C.S. Peirce. The truth is the opinion to which rational inquirers would converge in the limit. I take this to be a (broadly) epistemic account of truth. But I think there are strongly deflationary *and* correspondence ideas in Peirce's account.
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible?Accept: inconceivable