15 found

Year:

  1.  1
    On The‐Law Property Ascriptions to the Facts.Flávio Manuel Póvoa De Lima - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (2):231-250.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  1
    Overcoming Doctrinal School Thought: A Unifying Approach to Human Dignity.Philipp Gisbertz - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (2):196-207.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Human Rights: Existential, Not Metaphysical.Massimo La Torre - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (2):183-195.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  2
    Toward a Theory of Reasonableness.Michele Mangini - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (2):208-230.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  4
    Two Rights of Free Speech.Andrei Marmor - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (2):139-159.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  5
    Time in Law's Domain.Gerald J. Postema - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (2):160-182.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  1
    Ownership, Use, and Exclusivity: The Kantian Approach.Ernest J. Weinrib - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (2):123-138.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  2
    No Right to Classified Public Whistleblowing.Eric R. Boot - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (1):70-85.
    Given the crucial role unauthorized disclosures can play in uncovering grave government wrongdoing, it makes sense to search for a defense of justified cases of what I call “classified public whistleblowing.” The question that concerns me is what form such a defense should take. The main claim will be a negative one, namely, that a defense of whistleblowing cannot be based on individual rights, be they legal or moral, though this is indeed the most commonly proposed defense. In closing, I (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  4
    Coordination Cannot Establish Political Authority.Matthias Brinkmann - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (1):49-69.
    One of the most common arguments in favour of the state's authority is that without the coordinating hand of political institutions, we could not achieve important moral benefits. I argue that if we understand authority correctly, then coordination cannot even in principle establish that coordinators have political authority.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  3
    Why Dictatorial Authority Did Good, and Not Harm, to the Roman Republic. Dictatorship and Constitutional Change in Machiavelli.Marc de Wilde - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (1):86-99.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  2
    Editor's Note.Carla Faralli - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (1):3-3.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  3
    Antagonism, Natality, A‐Legality: A Phenomenological Itinerary on the Democratic Transgression of Politico‐Legal Orders.Ferdinando G. Menga - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (1):100-118.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  6
    Legal Positivism and Deontic Detachment.Robert Mullins - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (1):4-8.
    I consider a puzzle that arises when the logical principle known as “deontic detachment” is applied to the law. It is not possible to accept the principle of deontic detachment in a legal setting while also accepting that the so-called “social facts thesis” applies to all legal propositions. According to the social facts thesis, the existence and content of law is determined by the attitudes or practices of legal officials. Abandoning deontic detachment is not an appropriate solution to the problem—the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  6
    One Myth of the Classical Natural Law Theory: Reflecting on the “Thin” View of Legal Positivism.Veronica Rodriguez‐Blanco & Pilar Zambrano - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (1):9-32.
    Much controversy has emerged on the demarcation between legal positivism and non-legal positivism with some authors calling for a ban on the -as they see it- nonsensical labelling of legal philosophical debates. We agree with these critics; simplistic labelling cannot replace the work of sophisticated and sound argumentation. In this paper we do not use the term ‘legal positivism’ as a simplistic label but identify a specific position which we consider to be the most appealing and plausible view on legal (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  5
    The People and Populism.Giuseppe Zaccaria - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (1):33-48.
    “What is and what is defined as populism?” In response to this question the best political theories and philosophies have put forward many different answers, that are taken into account in this article. The article affirms the constitutive ambiguity of the concept of “populism” and its ability to unify very different issues. After analyzing some of the implications that populism entails in practice, the article stresses the link between populism and the end of the logic of the principle of representation, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues