56 found

Year:

  1.  8
    Is Ugliness a Pathology? An Ethical Critique of the Therapeuticalization of Cosmetic Surgery.Yves Saint James Aquino - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):431-441.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  10
    What Risks Should Be Permissible in Controlled Human Infection Model Studies?Ariella Binik - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):420-430.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  2
    Formula Feeding Can Help Illuminate Long‐Term Consequences of Full Ectogenesis.Zeljka Buturovic - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):331-337.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  6
    Ectogestation Ethics: The Implications of Artificially Extending Gestation for Viability, Newborn Resuscitation and Abortion.Lydia Di Stefano, Catherine Mills, Andrew Watkins & Dominic Wilkinson - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):371-384.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  7
    Procreation Machines: Ectogenesis as Reproductive Enhancement, Proper Medicine or a Step Towards Posthumanism?Johanna Eichinger & Tobias Eichinger - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):385-391.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  11
    Slipping on Slippery Slope Arguments.Roberto Fumagalli - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):412-419.
    Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) are used in a wide range of philosophical debates, but are often dismissed as empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious. In particular, leading authors put forward a meta-SSA which points to instances of empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious SSAs and to the alleged existence of a slippery slope leading to such SSAs to demonstrate that people should avoid using SSAs altogether. In this paper, I examine these prominent calls against using SSAs and argue that such calls do (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  3
    Equitable Access to Ectogenesis for Sexual and Gender Minorities.Laura L. Kimberly, Megan E. Sutter & Gwendolyn P. Quinn - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):338-345.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  52
    Neonatal Incubator or Artificial Womb? Distinguishing Ectogestation and Ectogenesis Using the Metaphysics of Pregnancy.Elselijn Kingma & Suki Finn - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):354-363.
    A 2017 Nature report was widely touted as hailing the arrival of the artificial womb. But the scientists involved claim their technology is merely an improvement in neonatal care. This raises an under-considered question: what differentiates neonatal incubation from artificial womb technology? Considering the nature of gestation—or metaphysics of pregnancy—(a) identifies more profound differences between fetuses and neonates/babies than their location (in or outside the maternal body) alone: fetuses and neonates have different physiological and physical characteristics; (b) characterizes birth as (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  4
    The ‘Tyranny of Reproduction’: Could Ectogenesis Further Women’s Liberation?Kathryn MacKay - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):346-353.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  55
    The Ethics of Ectogenesis.Joona Räsänen & Anna Smajdor - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):328-330.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  6
    Artificial Womb Technology and Clinical Translation: Innovative Treatment or Medical Research?Elizabeth Chloe Romanis - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):392-402.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  3
    Rethinking Patient Involvement in Healthcare Priority Setting.Lars Sandman, Bjorn Hofmann & Greg Bognar - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):403-411.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  14
    COVID19: Why Justice and Transparency in Hospital Triage Policies Are Paramount.Udo Schuklenk - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):325-327.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  3
    The Ethics of Ectogenesis‐Aided Foetal Treatment.Seppe Segers, Guido Pennings & Heidi Mertes - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):364-370.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  5
    Setting Health‐Care Priorities: What Ethical Theories Tell Us.Maxwell J. Smith - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):442-443.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  10
    Against the Family Veto in Organ Procurement: Why the Wishes of the Dead Should Prevail When the Living and the Deceased Disagree on Organ Donation.Andreas Albertsen - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):272-280.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  3
    Direct to Consumer Testing, Drugs and Gifts.Ruth Chadwick - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):222-222.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  14
    The Nuffield Council’s Green Light for Genome Editing Human Embryos Defies Fundamental Human Rights Law.Katherine Drabiak - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):223-227.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  11
    Progress Bias Versus Status Quo Bias in the Ethics of Emerging Science and Technology.Bjørn Hofmann - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):252-263.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  7
    Family Refusal of Emergency Medical Treatment in China: An Investigation From Legal, Empirical and Ethical Perspectives.Pingyue Jin & Xinqing Zhang - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):306-317.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  7
    Expanded FDA Regulation of Health and Wellness Apps.T. J. Kasperbauer & David E. Wright - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):235-241.
    This paper argues that the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) policy for health and wellness apps is ethically problematic. Currently, the FDA does not regulate health and wellness apps that are not intended for medical use. As a result of this hands‐off policy, preventing harm to consumers is left primarily to developers and app marketplaces. We argue that the FDA’s duties to prevent harm and maintain accountability to the American public require that they play a much stronger role. We also (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  32
    What Does Mental Health Have to Do with Well‐Being?Simon Keller - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):228-234.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  5
    View on Donated Life: Construction of Philosophical Ethics on Human Organ Donation.En‐Chang Li, Yi Yang & Wen‐pei Zhu - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):318-321.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  12
    A Moral Argument for Frozen Human Embryo Adoption.Rob Lovering - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):242-251.
    Some people (e.g., Drs. Paul and Susan Lim) and, with them, organizations (e.g., the National Embryo Donation Center) believe that, morally speaking, the death of a frozen human embryo is a very bad thing. With such people and organizations in mind, the question to be addressed here is as follows: if one believes that the death of a frozen embryo is a very bad thing, ought, morally speaking, one prevent the death of at least one frozen embryo via embryo adoption? (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  11
    Against Autonomy: How Proposed Solutions to the Problems of Living Wills Forgot its Underlying Principle.Laurel Mast - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):264-271.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  5
    Healthcare Organizations and High Profile Disagreements.Bryanna Moore & John D. Lantos - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):281-287.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  4
    Alive Inside.Andrew Peterson, Adrian M. Owen & Jason Karlawish - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):295-305.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28.  8
    ‘Alive by Default’: An Exploration of Velleman’s Unfair Burdens Argument Against State Sanctioned Euthanasia.Xavier Symons & Reginald Chua - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):288-294.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  66
    Improving the Justice‐Based Argument for Conducting Human Gene Editing Research to Cure Sickle Cell Disease.Berman Chan - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (2):200-202.
    In a recent article, Marilyn Baffoe-Bonnie offers three arguments for conducting CRISPR/Cas9 biotechnology research to cure sickle-cell disease (SCD) based on addressing historical and current injustices in SCD research and care. I show that her second and third arguments suffer from roughly the same defect, which is that they really argue for something else rather than for conducting CRISPR/Cas9 research in particular to cure SCD. For instance, the second argument argues that conducting this gene therapy research would improve the relationship (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  28
    Violinists, Demandingness, and the Impairment Argument Against Abortion.Dustin Crummett - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (2):214-220.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  88
    It is Better to Be Ignorant of Our Moral Enhancement: A Reply to Zambrano.Parker Crutchfield - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (2):190-194.
  32.  25
    Being Human: Why and in What Sense It is Morally Relevant.Roland Kipke - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (2):148-158.
    The debate on the question of the moral status of human beings and the boundaries of the moral community has long been dominated by the antagonism between personism and speciesism: either certain mental properties or membership of the human species is considered morally crucial. In this article, I argue that both schools of thought are equally implausible in major respects, and that these shortcomings arise from the same reason in both cases: a biological notion of being human. By contrast, I (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  11
    Impassable Scientific, Ethical and Legal Barriers to Body‐to‐Head Transplantation.Ruipeng Lei & Renzong Qiu - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (2):172-182.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  14
    Abortion is Incommensurable with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome.Claire Pickard - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (2):207-210.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  13
    Being a Burden to Others and Wishes to Die: The Importance of the Sociopolitical Context.Bernadette Roest, Margo Trappenburg & Carlo Leget - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (2):195-199.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  10
    On Justifying Arguments of Species Membership.Markus Rothhaar - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (2):159-165.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  16
    On the Ethics of AI Ethics.Udo Schuklenk - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (2):146-147.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  7
    Multibiologism: An Anthropological and Bioethical Framework for Moving Beyond Medicalization.Matthew Wolf‐Meyer - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (2):183-189.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  14
    Tu Youyou Winning the Nobel Prize: Ethical Research on the Value and Safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine.Wei‐Rong Zheng, En‐Chang Li, Song Peng & Xiao‐Shang Wang - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (2):166-171.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40. Great Minds Think Different: Preserving Cognitive Diversity in an Age of Gene Editing.Jonny Anomaly, Julian Savulescu & Christopher Gyngell - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):81-89.
  41.  12
    Conflicts of Interest in E‐Cigarette Research: A Public Good and Public Interest Perspective.Benjamin Capps, Yvette Eijk & Timothy M. Krahn - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):114-122.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  10
    Conflicts of Interest in E‐Cigarette Research: A Public Good and Public Interest Perspective.Benjamin Capps, Yvette van der Eijk & Timothy M. Krahn - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):114-122.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  11
    Finishing Our Story: Preparing for the End of Life Gregory L. Eastwood Oxford University Press: New York, 2019. 140 Pp. ISBN 9780190888084. US$14.95. [REVIEW]Michael Cholbi - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):142-143.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  48
    Germline Gene Editing and the Precautionary Principle.Julian J. Koplin, Christopher Gyngell & Julian Savulescu - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):49-59.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  45.  17
    Blurring the Germline: Genome Editing and Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance.Tim Lewens - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):7-15.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  16
    Using the Therapy and Enhancement Distinction in Law and Policy.Andrew McGee - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):70-80.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  5
    Regulating Germline Editing in Assisted Reproductive Technology: An EU Cross‐Disciplinary Perspective.Ana Nordberg, Timo Minssen, Oliver Feeney, Iñigo de Miguel Beriain, Lucia Galvagni & Kirmo Wartiovaara - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):16-32.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  6
    Regulating Germline Editing in Assisted Reproductive Technology: An EU Cross‐Disciplinary Perspective.Ana Nordberg, Timo Minssen, Oliver Feeney, Iñigo Miguel Beriain, Lucia Galvagni & Kirmo Wartiovaara - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):16-32.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  8
    Drawing the Line on in Vitro Gametogenesis.Lauren Notini, Christopher Gyngell & Julian Savulescu - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):123-134.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  18
    Do We Have a Right to an Unmanipulated Genome? The Human Genome as the Common Heritage of Mankind.Nadia Primc - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):41-48.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  51.  13
    Germline Genome Editing Versus Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Is There a Case in Favour of Germline Interventions?Robert Ranisch - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):60-69.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  52.  25
    Time to Start Intervening in the Human Germline? A Utilitarian Perspective.Kevin Smith - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):90-104.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  53.  3
    Misusing Uteruses? Childrearing Capacity and Access to Transplantable Wombs.Ryan Tonkens - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):105-113.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  54.  4
    Deciding with Dignity: The Account of Human Dignity as an Attitude and its Implications for Assisted Suicide.Eva Weber‐Guskar - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):135-141.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  55.  5
    Frozen Embryos and The Obligation to Adopt.Bruce P. Blackshaw & Nicholas Colgrove - 2020 - Bioethics:1-5.
    Rob Lovering has developed an interesting new critique of views that regard embryos as equally valuable as other human beings: the moral argument for frozen human embryo adoption. The argument is aimed at those who believe that the death of a frozen embryo is a very bad thing, and Lovering concludes that some who hold this view ought to prevent one of these deaths by adopting and gestating a frozen embryo. Contra Lovering, we show that there are far more effective (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  56.  18
    Defining Life From Death: Problems with the Somatic Integration Definition of Life.Bruce P. Blackshaw & Daniel Rodger - 2020 - Bioethics:1-5.
    To determine when the life of a human organism begins, Mark T. Brown has developed the somatic integration definition of life. Derived from diagnostic criteria for human death, Brown’s account requires the presence of a life‐regulation internal control system for an entity to be considered a living organism. According to Brown, the earliest point at which a developing human could satisfy this requirement is at the beginning of the fetal stage, and so the embryo is not regarded as a living (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues