Contemporary Pragmatism

ISSNs: 1572-3429, 1875-8185

7 found

View year:

  1. What’s a Meta for?Raymond Boisvert - 2025 - Contemporary Pragmatism 22 (1):51-58.
    This essay differs from Philström’s by offering a tinkering, not a full-blown critique. The alternative depends on a terminological distinction between ¨first-wave¨ Pragmatism and subsequent renditions. The thesis defended: Philström’s challenge depends on accepting first-wave Pragmatism´s formulations. These continued to foster a key ¨Modern¨ (Cartesian) assumption: that there was a rational, logical approach that could harmonize incompatibles. Such an approach invented a realm in which philosophers qua philosophers privileged intellectual purity and expelled incompatibles. Pragmatism moves away from this realm. It (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  1
    Pragmatism Against the Slope of Lunacy.T. J. Bonnet - 2025 - Contemporary Pragmatism 22 (1):40-50.
    While I emphatically share Pihlström’s alarm about the “lunacy” of contemporary politics and the grave threat of fascistic, conservative, and authoritative movements presently wrecking democracy around the globe, I do not, however, accept Pihlström’s argument about the pragmatic method precisely as a method for reconciliation. I contend that pragmatism should not be consolidated to a method, for mediation and reconciliation are not pragmatically useful today. Moreover, I submit that instead of mediation and reconciliation, pragmatism should concern itself with experience and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. “At the Outset, at Least”: Pragmatism, Mediation, and Punishment.John Capps - 2025 - Contemporary Pragmatism 22 (1):28-39.
    In “Pragmatism as Mediator—Seeking an Illusory Harmony?” (2023) Sami Pihlström takes a critical stance on pragmatic mediation. While agreeing with how pragmatic mediation functions in the context of philosophical disagreement, I argue for extending its role to more practical and policy-oriented contexts. In this response I sketch out a pragmatic approach to the function of punishment within the US legal system.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Should we be Building or Dismantling Echo Chambers?Marc Champagne - 2025 - Contemporary Pragmatism 22 (1):87–104.
    Sami Pihlström argues that, for principled reasons, we have a duty not to listen to racists. Although this stance can seem admirable, I worry that by cutting itself off from evidence, a refusal to listen leaves wrongfully accused persons no means of exonerating themselves. Moreover, given that concepts like racism now encompass beliefs and acts that many rightly consider sensible, a policy of silence risks dismissing implausibly large numbers of people as immoral. Stressing that listening is not acquiescing, I urge (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Responses to Commentators.Sami Pihlström - 2025 - Contemporary Pragmatism 22 (1):105-122.
    This article responds to the six essays critically commenting on my article, “Pragmatism as a Mediator – Seeking an Illusory Harmony?”.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  4
    On the Need to Avoid PragMAGAtism.Tadd Ruetenik - 2025 - Contemporary Pragmatism 22 (1):80-86.
    This article is a prudent attempt to address what the author believes is political and philosophical lunacy in our contemporary world. I argue that philosophers, pragmatic or otherwise, should be more interested in explaining the significance of the lunacy, and being creative and meliorative in responding to it. The concern of the article seems to be not only that of purifying pragmatism, but also protecting the ideal of liberal democracy. I believe the world is so radically experimental that trying to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  1
    Neuropragmatic Reconstruction, Not Transcendental Reconciliation: A Response to Pihlström’s “Pragmatism as a Mediator—Seeking an Illusory Harmony?”.Tibor Solymosi - 2025 - Contemporary Pragmatism 22 (1):59-79.
    I argue that Pihlström’s advocacy of both/and mediation is inadequate for making sense of contemporary difficulties, such as racism vs. antiracism and democracy vs. antidemocracy. This is due to an unwarranted equivocation between two incompatible kinds of rapprochement, reconciliation and reconstruction. In challenging Pihlström to get over James and on to Dewey and beyond, I propose neither/nor reconstruction instead of both/and reconciliation. I suggest that the former fits with neuropragmatism, while the latter with transcendental pragmatism. From this, I challenge Pihlström’s (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues