Year:

  1.  1
    Questioning … Arbogast Schmitt.Stefan Büttner - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):143-157.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  1
    Kritik über Robert (2021): Épicure aux enfers. Hérésie, athéisme et hédonisme au Moyen Âge.Carsten Flaig - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):204-214.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  4
    Antiochus’ and Cicero’s Different Theories of Memory in the Lucullus.Vittorio Hösle - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):1-17.
    The essay deals with an important epistemological debate in the Lucullus: Can there be remembrance of false beliefs, as Cicero argues against his interlocutor, who defends Antiochus’ position? It is shown that Antiochus, like Aristoteles, considers ‘remember’ to be a double achievement verb: Remembrance occurs only if a correct past perception is faithfully transmitted to the present. Cicero, on the other hand, insists that faithful transmission can also occur with false beliefs. The distinction seems to be analogous to that between (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  1
    ,,Virtus Cerebri – Organum Animae“ : Albert der Große Über Pythagoreische Lokalisations- Und Gehirntheorien.Udo Reinhold Jeck - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):35-106.
    The first part of this essay analyses the beginning of the philosophy of the brain in early Greece by looking at the Pythagorean theories of the brain. The knowledge of this innovative achievement of the Pythagorean school was never completely lost; it also got through to the Middle Ages. The second part focuses on the effect of Pythagorean thinking on Albert the Great. Albert systematically studied all available sources on Pythagoreanism and in doing so acquired extensive knowledge of this philosophical (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Kritik über Flashar (2020): Hellenistische Philosophie.Jan Kerkmann - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):192-200.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Humanismus Und Wahrheit : Zum Verlagsprogramm des Johannes Regiomontan.Esteban Law - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):107-128.
    This paper analyses the Verlagsanzeige of the humanist, mathematician, astronomer and publisher Johannes Regiomontanus. How is humanism expressed in this famous document from German early printing and what is its relationship to philosophy? The article shows that Regiomontanus advocated a special form of humanism that went beyond the standard humanism that he valued, with ‘truth’ as its most important aspect. From the epistemological perspective of the history of philosophy in Regiomontanus’s publishing programme, the ‘truth’ of mathematics is seen, analogous to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  1
    A Late Medieval Zeitgeist Analysis : De Statu Mundi Actuali – On the Actual State of the World.Latin Text and English Translation.Olaf Pluta - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):129-142.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  2
    Review of Zwollo (2018): St Augustine and Plotinus: The Human Mind as Image of the Divine. [REVIEW]Juan C. Rivera - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):201-203.
  9.  1
    Kritik über Olivi, Nickl & Franco (2021): Traktat über Verträge.Christian Rode - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):186-191.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Cicero, Academica 1.45 : Interpreting Academic History.Charles Snyder - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):18-34.
    Focused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Cicero, Academica 1.45 : Interpreting Academic History.Charles Snyder - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):18-34.
    Focused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Cicero, Academica 1.45 : Interpreting Academic History.Charles Snyder - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):18-34.
    Focused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  1
    Cicero, Academica 1.45 : Interpreting Academic History.Charles Snyder - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):18-34.
    Focused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  3
    Cicero, Academica 1.45 : Interpreting Academic History.Charles Snyder - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):18-34.
    Focused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  1
    Cicero, Academica 1.45 : Interpreting Academic History.Charles Snyder - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):18-34.
    Focused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. Cicero, Academica 1.45 : Interpreting Academic History.Charles Snyder - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):18-34.
    Focused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Cicero, Academica 1.45 : Interpreting Academic History.Charles Snyder - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):18-34.
    Focused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Cicero, Academica 1.45 : Interpreting Academic History.Charles Snyder - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):18-34.
    Focused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Cicero, Academica 1.45 : Interpreting Academic History.Charles Snyder - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):18-34.
    Focused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  2
    Cicero, Academica 1.45 : Interpreting Academic History.Charles Snyder - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):18-34.
    Focused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  1
    Kritik über Überweg, Cesalli & Hartung (): Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie & Imbach, Schulthess, Cesalli, Imbach, de Libera, Ricklin & Heller (2021): Die Philosophie des Mittelalters.Norbert Winkler - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):164-185.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  1
    Kritik über Pietsch, Krämer, Menze, Nölker, Dörrie, Baltes & Pietsch (2020): Die philosophische Lehre des Platonismus. Die Ethik im antiken Platonismus der Kaiserzeit. Bausteine 231-252: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. [REVIEW]Thomas Zimmer - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24 (1):158-163.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  1
    Cicero, Academica 1.45.Charles Snyder - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 24:18-34.
    Focused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  3
    Kritik über Zekl & Zekl (2018): Restauratio Coeli oder Von Peuerbach bis Rheticus. Texte zur Genesis der Kopernikanischen Wende dargestellt in Biographien von Pierre Gassendi.Stefan Düfel - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 23.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  7
    Mirum Est Si Intellectus Noster Omnem Scientiam Accipiens Ex Phantasmate.Ile Vlad - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 23.
    Albert`s so called “anthropology” is putting the human being on the top of a hierarchy of living things in virtue of a unique feature – i.e. the possession of the intellect – that offers the possibility to transcend the changing realm of nature and to rise its possessor to the dignity of his creator. Although, throughout his corpus Albert often defends the independence of the human intellect from matter and consequently from the body and senses, his works of natural philosophy (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues