24 found

Year:

  1.  2
    Randomized Controlled Trials: How Can We Know “What Works”?Cowen Nick, Virk Baljinder, Mascarenhas-Keyes Stella & Cartwright Nancy - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (3):265-292.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  5
    The Problem of Epistocratic Identification and the Dysfunctional Division of Epistemic Labor.Friedman Jeffrey - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (3):293-327.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  7
    The Means and Ends of Deliberative Democracy: Rejoinder to Gunn.Jonathan Kuyper - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (3):328-350.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  8
    The Origins of Individualism.Daniel Lee - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (3):351-361.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  7
    Unfit for Democracy? Irrational, Rationalizing, and Biologically Predisposed Citizens.Shawn Rosenberg - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (3):362-387.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  7
    Finding the “Sovereign” in “Sovereign Immunity”: Lessons From Bodin, Hobbes, and Rousseau.David Schraub - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (3):388-413.
    The doctrine of “sovereign immunity” holds that the U.S. government cannot be sued without its consent. This is not found in the Constitution’s text; it is justified on philosophical grounds as inherent to being a sovereign state: a sovereign must be able to issue commands free from constraint. The sources of this understanding of sovereignty—Hobbes, Bodin, and others—are, in turn, condemned by opponents of sovereign immunity as absolutists whose doctrines are incompatible with limited, constitutional government. This debate, and thus the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  6
    What Is It Like to Be a Social Scientist?Stephen J. DeCanio - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (2):121-140.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  4
    Consciousness at the Interface: Wendt, Eastern Wisdom and the Ethics of Intra-Action.K. M. Fierke - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (2):141-169.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  1
    The Interdependence of Intra- and Inter-Subjectivity in Constructivist Institutionalism.Colin Hay - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (2):235-247.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  1
    One World or Many?Robert Jervis - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (2):170-188.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  3
    Theorizing Ideas and Discourse in Political Science: Intersubjectivity, Neo-Institutionalisms, and the Power of Ideas.Vivien A. Schmidt - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (2):248-263.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  3
    Wendt’s Challenge to Social Science: Quantum Physics, Consciousness, and Society.Sven Steinmo - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (2):189-198.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  5
    Schrödinger’s Cat and the Dog That Didn’T Bark: Why Quantum Mechanics is Irrelevant to the Social Sciences.David Waldner - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (2):199-233.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  1
    Constraining Knowledge: Traditions and Rules That Limit Medical Innovation.Amar Bhidé - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (1):1-33.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  1
    Constraining Knowledge: Traditions and Rules That Limit Medical Innovation.Amar Bhidé - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (1):1-33.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  4
    Propaganda About Propaganda.Brennan Jason - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (1):34-48.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  2
    Propaganda About Propaganda.Brennan Jason - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (1):34-48.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  1
    Democracy and Truth: A Contingent Defense of Epistemic Democracy.Gustavo Hessmann Dalaqua - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (1):49-71.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  1
    Democracy and Truth: A Contingent Defense of Epistemic Democracy.Gustavo Hessmann Dalaqua - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (1):49-71.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  1
    Deliberative Democracy and the Systemic Turn: Reply to Kuyper.Paul Gunn - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (1):88-119.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  2
    Deliberative Democracy and the Systemic Turn: Reply to Kuyper.Paul Gunn - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (1):88-119.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  1
    Diversity, Ability, and Democracy: A Note on Thompson’s Challenge to Hong and Page.Daniel Kuehn - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (1):72-87.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  1
    Diversity, Ability, and Democracy: A Note on Thompson’s Challenge to Hong and Page.Daniel Kuehn - 2017 - Critical Review 29 (1):72-87.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  13
    Democracy Before, in, and After Schumpeter.Pettit Philip - 2017 - Critical Review 29:1-13.
    The classical model of democracy that Schumpeter criticizes is manufactured out of a variety of earlier ideas, not those of any one thinker or even one school of thought. His critique of the central ideals by which he defines the model--those of the common will and the common good--remains persuasive. People's preferences are too messy and too manipulable to allow us to think that mass democracy can promote those ideals, as he defines them. Should we endorse his purely electoral model (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues