Year:

  1.  2
    Opposing California’s WaterFix: The Trump Administration and the Future of Environmental Advocacy.Razvan Amironesei & Caleb Scoville - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):29-33.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  1
    The Politics of Apathy: Trumping the Ethical Imperative of Climate Change.Nino Antadze - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):45-47.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  3
    Commutative Justice and Access and Benefit Sharing for Genetic Resources.Anna Deplazes-Zemp - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):110-126.
    The Convention on Biological Diversity and its Nagoya Protocol established an Access and Benefit Sharing system between utilizers and providers of genetic resources. ABS is understood as a tool that should promote commutative justice between the involved parties. This essay discusses what exactly it is that is being exchanged in the ABS process. It critically analyses moral claims to compensation that are implied by the ABS system for genetic resources. It argues that with the exception of cases in which traditional (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  2
    The Dangers of Replacing ‘Adaptation to Climate Change’ with ‘Resilient Solutions’.Justin Donhauser - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):34-38.
  5.  1
    Distributing Risks: Allocation Principles for Distributing Reversible and Irreversible Losses.Neelke Doorn - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):96-109.
    This paper aims to develop a framework for distributing risks. Based on a distinction between risks with reversible losses and risks with irreversible losses, I defend the following composite allocation principle: first, irreversible risks should be allocated on the basis of needs and only after some threshold level has been achieved can the remaining risks distributed in such a way that the total disvalue of these losses is minimized. An important advantage of this allocation framework is that it does not (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  1
    Trump’s Military as the De Facto Environmental Leader.Jai Galliott - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):13-16.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. To Trump’s Chagrin, Non-Nationals Are Still In.Eric S. Godoy - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):42-44.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  37
    Climate Change, Moral Integrity, and Obligations to Reduce Individual Greenhouse Gas Emissions.Trevor Hedberg - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):64-80.
    Environmental ethicists have not reached a consensus about whether or not individuals who contribute to climate change have a moral obligation to reduce their personal greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, I side with those who think that such individuals do have such an obligation by appealing to the concept of integrity. I argue that adopting a political commitment to work toward a collective solution to climate change—a commitment we all ought to share—requires also adopting a personal commitment to reduce (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    From a National Monument to a National Disgrace.Margot Higgins - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):9-12.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  1
    Those Who Bring From the Earth: Anti-Environmentalism and the Trope of the White Male Worker.John Hultgren - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):21-25.
    The 2016 Republican Party platform is unabashed in its rejection of environmental principles and its embrace of extractive labor. Its ‘Natural Resources’ section reads: ‘[w]e are the party of America's growers, producers, farmers, ranchers, foresters, miners, commercial fishermen, and all those who bring from the earth the crops, minerals, energy, and the bounties of our seas.’ What is interesting about this statement is its selective view of productive labor. Not all who bring from the earth are equally valued within the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. If You’Re ‘Still In’ the Paris Climate Agreement, Then Show Us the Money.Georges Alexandre Lenferna - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):52-55.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  2
    Social Constructivism and Beyond. On the Double Bind Between Politics and Science.Matthias Lievens & Anneleen Kenis - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):81-95.
    Moving beyond the post-political framing of the climate change debate, scholars have tried to show that scientific practice is based on politically significant forms of social construction. While sympathizing with this attempt, this paper questions their use of the term ‘political’. Drawing on post-foundational political theory and focusing on the example of climate denialism, it argues that the relation between science and the political constitutes a double bind: while upholding an original distinction between science and the political is untenable, representing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Year One of Donald Trump’s Presidency on Climate and the Environment.Andrew Light & Benjamin Hale - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):1-3.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  2
    The Case for Preserving Bears Ears.Justin McBrayer & Sarah Roberts-Cady - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):48-51.
    In December of 2017, President Trump reduced the size of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante Monuments by 2 million acres. Conservatives rejoiced, and progressives railed. Yet neither side has clearly identified the moral facets of the situation. The crucial moral question is this: How ought public property be regulated to protect landscapes with cultural significance? We offer criteria for determining when something has cultural value and argue that the moral merits of the present case turn on whether the reduction adequately (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  1
    Two Moral Arguments for a Global Social Cost of Carbon.Kian Mintz-Woo - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):60-63.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  2
    Bristol Bay and Pebble Mine: Mutual Flourishing or Midas’ Touch.David L. O’Hara - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):26-28.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Equitable Local Climate Action Planning: Sustainable & Affordable Housing.Andrew Pattison & Jason Kawall - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):17-20.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  2
    An Analysis of Potential Ethical Justifications for Mammoth De-Extinction And a Call for Empirical Research.Yasha Rohwer & Emma Marris - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):127-142.
    We argue that the de-extinction of the mammoth cannot be ethically grounded by duties to the extinct mammoth, to ecosystem health or to individual organisms in ecosystems missing the mammoth. However, the action can be shown to be morally permissible via the goods it will afford humans, including advances in scientific knowledge, valuable experiences of awe and pleasure, and perhaps improvements to our moral character or behaviour—if and only if suffering is minimal. Finally, we call for empirical research into how (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  6
    Rational Coherence in Environmental Policy: Paris, Montreal, and Kigali.Nathaniel Sharadin - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):4-8.
    In June 2017, President Trump announced that the US intends to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. The decision was widely viewed as an abrogation of US leadership in confronting a changing climate. I’m not interested here in the decision to withdraw from Paris per se. Instead, I’m interested in Paris as a useful contrast for the administration’s attitude towards a different international environmental agreement: the Montreal Protocol.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  1
    The Axiological Problem with Trump’s Wall and Endangered Species.Ian A. Smith - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):39-41.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  1
    Going to Alone: Cities and States for Climate Action.Lachlan Montgomery Umbers & Jeremy Moss - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):56-59.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues