Ethics

ISSN: 0014-1704

14 found

View year:

  1.  55
    Review of Tamar Schapiro: Feeling Like It: A Theory of Inclination and Will[REVIEW]Nomy Arpaly - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):438-443.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  25
    Review of Thomas Kelly: Bias: A Philosophical Study[REVIEW]Endre Begby - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):416-420.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  29
    Cooperative activity, shared intention, and exploitation.Olle Blomberg & Erik Malmqvist - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):387-401.
    Jules Salomone-Sehr argues that an activity is cooperative if and only if, roughly, it consists of several participants’ actions that are (i) coordinated for a common purpose (ii) in ways that do not undermine any participant’s agency. He argues that guidance by shared intention is neither necessary nor sufficient for cooperation. Thereby, he claims to “topple an orthodoxy of shared agency theory." In response, we argue that Salomone-Sehr’s account captures another notion of cooperation than the sociopsychological notion shared agency theory (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  42
    Review of John Kekes: Moderate Conservatism: Reclaiming the Center[REVIEW]Jason Brennan - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):411-416.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  20
    Review of Artūrs Logins: Normative Reasons: Between Reasoning and Explanation[REVIEW]John Brunero - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):420-425.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  90
    What’s Unjust about Structural Injustice?David Estlund - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):333-359.
    Structural injustice is either wrong or not. A deontic view, on which there is no injustice except agents’ wrongdoing, may have trouble reaching such intuitive cases as structural sexism, and especially structural class inequality. An alternative telic approach, on which injustice is bad but not wrong, can reach those cases. But how could injustice in that telic sense warrant resentment or righteous anger, as it seems injustice must? I press the dilemma to scrutinize not only the current idea of structural (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  16
    Review of Owen Flanagan: How to Do Things with Emotions: The Morality of Anger and Shame Across Cultures[REVIEW]Maria Heim - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):407-411.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  18
    Review of Hichem Naar: The Rationality of Love[REVIEW]Troy Jollimore - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):431-435.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  53
    Strict Moral Answerability.Maximilian Kiener - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):360-386.
    Bernard Williams described the case of a lorry driver who runs over a child through no fault of his own. In this article, I pursue two aims. First, I want to motivate a puzzle about Williams’s case, which I call the Lorry Driver Paradox and which consists of three individually plausible but jointly inconsistent claims. Second, I want to offer a solution to this paradox based on a novel approach to so-called strict moral answerability. I conclude by responding to the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  9
    Review of Michael Robillard and Bradley Strawser: Outsourcing Duty: The Moral Exploitation of the American Soldier[REVIEW]George Lucas - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):436-438.
  11.  28
    Review of Berislav Marusić: On the Temporality of Emotions: An Essay on Grief, Anger, and Love[REVIEW]Oded Na’Aman - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):426-431.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  16
    Review of Jeff Sebo: Saving Animals, Saving Ourselves: Why Animals Matter for Pandemics, Climate Change, and Other Catastrophes[REVIEW]Walter Veit & Heather Browning - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):443-447.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Review of Tom Dougherty: The Scope of Consent[REVIEW]Elise Woodard - 2024 - Ethics 134 (3):402-407.
  14. The Balancing View of Ought.Thomas Schmidt - 2024 - Ethics 134 (2):246-267.
    I defend a novel way of working out the Balancing View of Ought, that is, the view that whether one ought to take some action depends on nothing but the balance of the reasons for the action and those against it or for its alternatives. I show that the Balancing View needs to be complemented by certain principles of reason transmission, at least one of which might seem rather surprising. The result is an attractive theoretical package that allows for compelling (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues