Year:

  1.  1
    Response to “Understanding the God of Love: An Essay on Lonergan’s Systematics of the Trinity”.Jeremy W. Blackwood - 2020 - The Lonergan Review 11:125-134.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  1
    A Discerning Church: Pope Francis, Lonergan, and a Theological Method for the Future.Lucas Briola - 2020 - The Lonergan Review 11:141-145.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  1
    Mediation, Culture, and Religion: Approaching Lonergan’s Method in Theology.John D. Dadosky - 2020 - The Lonergan Review 11:53-75.
    In this paper I explore the “Introduction” to Method in Theology and examine the presuppositions of this importanttext. These are concepts that Lonergan deemed necessary for introducing his work on functional specialization. I focus on mediation as a two-way process and the empirical notion of culture. It is interesting how these two significant ideas make their way into the brief introduction, which Lonergan wrote last when composing the text.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  2
    Before Truth: Lonergan, Aquinas, and the Problem of Wisdom.Hannah Ferguson - 2020 - The Lonergan Review 11:160-164.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  1
    Introduction: At the Level of Our Time.Gregory P. Floyd - 2020 - The Lonergan Review 11:5-10.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  3
    Divine Scripture in Human Understanding: A Systematic Theology of the Christian Bible.Ryan Hemmer - 2020 - The Lonergan Review 11:146-149.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  1
    Understanding the God of Love.John Laracy - 2020 - The Lonergan Review 11:94-123.
    In this paper I argue that the eternal unity of Lonergan’s “three divine subjects” must be understood in light of the eternal love of the divine persons, revealed in Christ’s relationship withthe Father. This new starting point in triune agapē need not threaten the integrity of Lonergan’s thought, as long as one reads his psychological analogy as a preliminary heuristic structure. Indeed, the tensions and developments in his own systematics justify this move.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  1
    Newman, His Influences, and His Influence.Richard M. Liddy - 2020 - The Lonergan Review 11:76-93.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  1
    Toward Self-Possession: Being at Home in Conscious Performance.Richard M. Liddy - 2020 - The Lonergan Review 11:150-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  1
    Response to “Understanding the God of Love: An Essay on Lonergan’s Systematics of the Trinity”.David C. Schindler - 2020 - The Lonergan Review 11:135-138.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  2
    Vocation, Business Leadership, and the Pursuit of Understanding.J. Michael Stebbins - 2020 - The Lonergan Review 11:36-52.
    To have a vocation is to be called to a life of ongoing participation in the redemptive work of the Son and the Holy Spirit. Being faithful to the vocation we have received requires adopting a stance of continuing alertness, ready to notice, correctly interpret, and effectively respond to the various forms of communication by which God draws us into closer cooperation with the redemptive missions of the Son and the Spirit. In this paper I focus on a particular vehicle (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  3
    Political Responsibility in Time of Civil War.Jeremy D. Wilkins - 2020 - The Lonergan Review 11:13-35.
    In this article I propose to do five things. First, I describe the present confusion disturbing the tranquility of the American polity. Next, I hypothesize that an important source of civil confusion is that American civildiscourse is generally conducted in two different moral languages. Neither of these is adequate to the reality of the human good, and their speakers are, perhaps increasingly, given to misunderstanding one another. Third, I propose some reasons why not only misunderstanding but even outright hostility seems (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues