This essay provides a close reading of the intriguing aphorism entitled “In the great silence”’ that opens the final part of Nietzsche’s text of 1881, Dawn (Morgenröthe). Highly enigmatic and interpretatively demanding, aphorism 423 of the book is an instance of Nietzsche's unique style of doing philosophy and reveals important facets of his thinking. Our essay in particular attempts to illuminate Nietzsche’s thinking on nature, the sublime, and silence. We bring him into rapport with Emerson in an effort to clarify (...) the aphorism’s teaching on silence and with Santayana to illuminate the nature and character of our sympathy with nature. (shrink)

This paper engages work by philosophers from multiple intellectual traditions to analyze practical dilemmas of social trust in public space that are not suitably captured by judgment-based accounts of trust and trustworthiness. Repurposing concepts developed by Eve Sedgwick, I argue that deficient trust judgments, especially in the form of excessive distrust, may not be correctable without a change in the imaginative stance that underlies a person's relational orientation to unknown others. Reparative trust imagines and desires positive social possibilities and surprises (...) without thereby casting off concern for self-protection. (shrink)

This essay outlines the possibilities and limits of phenomenology as an ecophilic mode of thought in the context of a heightened, posthuman scrutiny of anthropocentrism, and advocates a self-reflexive environmental humanities informed by phenomenological insight. It aims to demonstrate that, despite its privileging of human consciousness, phenomenology offers important ecocritical resources, including methodological reflection on the constitution and limits of a human perspective; a vision of a meaningful lifeworld; a rendering of subjectivity as embodied within a larger vital materiality; and (...) a critical response to human-induced crisis. It is argued that the methodological openness of phenomenology to imaginative variation can foster explorations beyond the human, while curbing the hubris of claiming to speak for the nonhuman world, and that a phenomenological orientation may avoid neutralizing the perspectives of those suffering intra-human harms in the context of environmental injustice while maintaining the human as the respondent in calls for environmental reckoning. (shrink)

After the thinking of his time has passed, what can Spinoza still tell us today? In this essay, I will take Spinoza’s ethics out of the metaphysics in which his thinking was formed, deconstructing his notions of substance, human body, God, and intellectual love, in order to redeem their use and promise for everyday life. This essay is therefore an attempt to rethink in fundamental ways how Spinoza’s ethics could be detached and freed from his problematic ontology, so as to (...) continue addressing us living today in a world that increasingly functions without reference to God. What might make his ethics, thus unbound, still relevant? (shrink)

“The history of philosophy” in the academe typically refers only to a history of Western philosophy with a Western-centric periodization. Kant laid the theoretical foundation for this practice by introducing a concept of history that imposed strict a priori constraints on constructing a historiography of philosophy and by articulating a racist-cum-orientalist worldview that disqualified non-whites and non-Westerners from the claim to true philosophy. Historians of (Western) philosophy today must go beyond a superficial Western-centric project of canon fixing and initiate radical (...) structural changes in the academe to engender a more equitable, inclusive, and pluralistic treatment of various philosophical traditions. (shrink)

On multiple occasions, Theodor W. Adorno turned to Oswald Spengler’s The Decline of the West as a resource for the critical anatomy of a capitalist society in which laissez-faire liberalism was being overtaken by an authoritarian coordination of the political and the economic. This article revisits Spengler’s reactionary prophecies about late capitalist civilization in light of Adorno’s arguments. It explores a dimension of Spengler’s thought insufficiently addressed in Adorno’s writings and resonant with our present moment, namely the claim that an (...) emergent “Caesarism” would be helmed by figures like Cecil Rhodes, entrepreneurial Übermenschen spawned by racial imperialism. (shrink)