Year:

  1. Annie Hourcade: Le Conseil Dans la Pensée Antique. Les Sophistes, Platon, Aristote. [REVIEW]Francesca Alesse - 2018 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 39 (1):157-162.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. L’articolazione argomentativa di Plat. Soph. 237b7–239a11 e la natura del medamos on.Francesco Aronadio - 2018 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 39 (1):57-98.
    In Soph. 237b7–239a11 Plato lays out a sequence of arguments that are generally considered homogenous. An analysis of each argument can shed light on the need to differentiate their respective nature. Firstly, it will be shown that the arguments do not work only at the linguistic level, contrary to the way these passages are interpreted by most of commentators. The meta–linguistic nature of the third argument will be particularly emphasised. Secondly, it will be argued that the three arguments follow each (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Luc Brisson: Platon. L’écrivain qui inventa la philosophie. [REVIEW]Chiara Bonuglia - 2018 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 39 (1):163-164.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. La version α du livre VII de la Physique d’Aristote et son rapport aux familles byzantines a et b.Mai-Lan Boureau - 2018 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 39 (1):99-148.
    This paper focuses on the relation between version α of the seventh book of Aristotle’s Physics and the two byzantine families which shape the transmission lineage of most Aristotelian texts. To this end, it establishes a stemma codicum of all known manuscripts of version α. The first step reexamines Simplicius’ testimony in order to overcome the stemmatic problem arising from it: Simplicius’ statement that there was a version β for chapters 4 and 5 seems to be mere speculation on his (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  1
    Il frammento gnoseologico di Eutidemo.Aldo Brancacci - 2018 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 39 (1):7-27.
    Euthydemus is included neither in Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker by Diels–Kranz nor in Sofisti. Testimonianze e frammenti by Untersteiner nor in Early Greek Philosophy by Laks and Most. Likewise, the great twentieth century works on the Sophists do not give space to him, at best mentioning him briefly. Yet Euthydemus is the author of a fragment, which was quoted by Plato in his Cratylus, and on which again there is no modern study. This paper sets out to study this fragment (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  2
    Jürgen Hammerstaedt, Pierre-Marie Morel, Refik Güremen: Diogenes of Oinoanda. Epicureanism and Philosophical Debates / Diogène D’Œnoanda. Épicurisme Et Controverses. [REVIEW]Federico G. Corsi - 2018 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 39 (1):179-184.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Ricordando Mario Vegetti.Silvia Gastaldi - 2018 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 39 (1):1-5.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Pierre Pellegrin: L’Excellence menacée. Sur la philosophie politique d’Aristote. [REVIEW]Silvia Gastaldi - 2018 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 39 (1):165-170.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. L’Iliade et l’Odyssée, un matériau fertile pour la pensée philosophique : le bon usage d’Homère dans l’Hippias Mineur.Emmanuelle Jouët-Pastré - 2018 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 39 (1):29-55.
    In Hippias Minor, Plato does not merely condemn Homer as a reference in ethical matters. He opposes two uses of poetry when it comes to referring to and giving meaning to it: poetry as a source of knowledge admitted and frozen by tradition, ethically normative, and poetry as a source of philosophical questions, conducive to ethical reflection. The debate shows that Socrates’ view of Homer, as well as his Homeric point of view, allow us to ask good and often paradoxical (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Harold Tarrant, Danielle A. Layne, Dirk Baltzly, François Renaud: Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. [REVIEW]Anna Motta - 2018 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 39 (1):171-178.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Mathilde Brémond: Lectures de Mélissos. Édition, Traduction Et Interprétation des Témoignages Sur Mélissos de Samos. [REVIEW]Massimo Pulpito - 2018 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 39 (1):149-156.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues