View year:

  1.  1
    Freedom to avoid harm.Allen Alvarez, Espen Dyrnes Stabell & May Thorseth - 2022 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1:1-3.
    The editorial introduces original articles, a commentary and book review.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  1
    Revisiting the limits of free speech: Lavik's ban on climate denialism.Efren Alverio Ii - 2022 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1:53-56.
    A commentary on Trygve Lavik's article "Climate change denial, freedom of speech and global justice".
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  18
    Lowering Toilet Seats.Bouke De Vries - 2022 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1:21-31.
    _Many people who stand to pee raise the toilet seat so that they have a larger target to aim at. However, if the seat is left in this position, any subsequent toilet user who defecates or pees sitting down will need to lower the seat. Some of us believe that this inconvenience should not be visited on those who pee sitting down, while others deny that there is anything wrong with leaving the toilet seat in the position that you used (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  7
    Revisiting the limits of free speech: Lavik's ban on climate denialism.I. I. Efren Alverio - 2022 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1:53-56.
    A commentary on Trygve Lavik's article "Climate change denial, freedom of speech and global justice".
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  10
    Universities and other Institutions – not Hate Speech Laws – are a threat to Freedom of Political Speech.Sigri Gaïni - 2022 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1:5-19.
    _One of the strongest arguments against hate speech legislation is the so-called Argument from Political Speech. This argument problematizes the restrictions that might be placed on political opinions or political critique when these opinions are expressed in a way which can be interpreted as ‘hateful’ towards minority groups. One of the strongest free speech scholars opposing hate speech legislation is Ronald Dworkin, who stresses that having restrictions on hate speech is, in fact, illegitimate in a liberal democracy. The right to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  3
    Evidens, estetikk og etikk.Bjørn Hofmann - 2022 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1:33-52.
    _Helsevesenet har blitt en sentral samfunnsaktør og medisinen dets førende fag. Hvorfor har det blitt slik? En grunn er at medisinen fører sammen sfærer som ellers har vært adskilt: det sanne, det gode og det skjønne. Medisinen som fag og helsevesenet som institusjon, har blitt et fascinerende skjæringspunkt nettopp mellom evidens, etikk og estetikk. Her kobles kunnskap til det som er vondt og skjønnhet til det som er friskt. Kunnskapsproduksjonen dirigeres ut fra ønsket om å gjøre det gode ved å (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  2
    Bidragsyterne - Contributors.EiP The Editors - 2022 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  2
    Klar for en ny teori i bioetikk?Kamilla Østerberg & Henrik Wathne - 2022 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1:57-62.
    Bokanmeldelse av DeGrazia, D., & Millum, J. (2021). _A Theory of Bioethics_. Cambridge University Press. 316 sider. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009026710.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues