Year:

  1.  54
    On the Relationship Between Speech Acts and Psychological States.Seungbae Park - 2014 - Pragmatics and Cognition 22 (3):430-351.
    This paper defends a theory of speech act that I call concurrentism. It consists of the following three theses. 1. We believe, ceteris paribus, that other people’s speech acts concur with their beliefs. 2. Our speech acts, ceteris paribus, concur with our beliefs. 3. When our speech acts deviate from our beliefs, we do not, ceteris paribus, declare the deviations to other people. Concurrentism sheds light on what the hearer believes when he hears an indicative sentence, what the speaker believes (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  22
    Scientists’ Use of Diagrams in Developing Mechanistic Explanations: A Case Study From Chronobiology.Daniel C. Burnston, Benjamin Sheredos, Adele Abrahamsen & William Bechtel - 2014 - Pragmatics and Cognition 22 (2):224-243.
  3.  3
    Iconicity: From Sign to System in Human Communication and Language.Nicolas Fay, Mark Ellison & Simon Garrod - 2014 - Pragmatics and Cognition 22 (2):244-263.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  4
    Istvan Kecskes: Intercultural Pragmatics.Anita Fetzer - 2014 - Pragmatics and Cognition 22 (2):284-289.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  5
    Diagrammatic Reasoning: An Introduction.Riccardo Fusaroli & Kristian Tylén - 2014 - Pragmatics and Cognition 22 (2):183-186.
    Many types of everyday and specialized reasoning depend on diagrams: we use maps to fnd our way, we draw graphs and sketches to communicate concepts and prove geometrical theorems, and we manipulate diagrams to explore new creative solutions to problems. While the linear and symbolic character of verbal language has long served as the predominant model of human thought, it is remarkable how — through a range of contexts — thinking and communication critically depend on manipulations of external, ofen non-linear, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  5
    Thinking in Action.Barbara Tversky & Angela Kessell - 2014 - Pragmatics and Cognition 22 (2):206-223.
  7.  6
    Diagrammatic Reasoning: Abstraction, Interaction, and Insight.Kristian Tylén, Riccardo Fusaroli, Johanne Stege Bjørndahl, Joanna Raczaszek-Leonardi, Svend Østergaard & Frederik Stjernfelt - 2014 - Pragmatics and Cognition 22 (2):264-283.
    Many types of everyday and specialized reasoning depend on diagrams: we use maps to find our way, we draw graphs and sketches to communicate concepts and prove geometrical theorems, and we manipulate diagrams to explore new creative solutions to problems. The active involvement and manipulation of representational artifacts for purposes of thinking and communicating is discussed in relation to C.S. Peirce’s notion of diagrammatical reasoning. We propose to extend Peirce’s original ideas and sketch a conceptual framework that delineates different kinds (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  4
    Diagrams, Jars, and Matchsticks: A Systemicist’s Toolkit.Frederic Vallee-Tourangeau & Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau - 2014 - Pragmatics and Cognition 22 (2):187-205.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues