Philosophical Investigations 13 (28):221-234 (2019)
AbstractOne of the most challenging issues in medical ethics is a permission or prohibition of euthanasia. Is a patient with an incurable disease who has lots of pain permitted to kill oneself or ask others to do that? The main reason advanced by the opponents is the absolute prohibition of murder. Accordingly, the meaning of murder plays a key role in determining the moral judgment of euthanasia. The aim of this paper is to confirm the role of intention in moral judgment of euthanasia and eliminate the name of unjust murder from voluntary euthanasia. The Intention of an agent determines the name of the act and whether it is right or wrong. An important point that dose not taken into account in the definitions of murder, killing as well as their ethical judgment is considering the attributes of being unjust and forcible. Killing a human being is neither intrinsically good nor bad, but its ethical judgment depends on the way that happens, i.e. just or unjust. Every killing is neither bad nor unethical except unjust one which is both bad and unethical. The attribute of “unjust” has been mentioned in the definition of murder in Islamic jurisprudence, law, traditions, and Quran. Owing to this argument, on one hand, it is true to state that voluntary euthanasia is not unjust and forcible murder, and on the other hand, it is not true to say that voluntary euthanasia is unjust and forcible murder. It can be concluded that voluntary euthanasia is an independent title other than unjust murder and does not have its judgment.
Similar books and articles
Peter Singer and Non-Voluntary 'Euthanasia': Tripping Down the Slippery Slope.Suzanne Uniacke & H. J. Mccloskey - 1992 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (2):203-219.
Japanese Attitudes Toward Euthanasia In Hypothetical Clinical Situations.Noritoshi Tanida - 1998 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 8 (5):138-141.
Killing People: What Kant Could Have Said About Suicide and Euthanasia but Did Not.I. Brassington - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (10):571-574.
Raping and Making Love Are Different Concepts: So Are Killing and Voluntary Euthanasia.J. Davies - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):148-149.
Moral Permissibility of Euthanasia: A Case Discussion From Bangladesh.Azam Golam - 2007 - The Dhaka University Studies 63 (2):157-169.
A Problem for the Idea of Voluntary Euthanasia.N. Campbell - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (3):242-244.
Empirical Research in the Debate on Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia.Stephen W. Smith - 2007 - Clinical Ethics 2 (3):129-132.
Active and Passive Physician‐Assisted Dying and the Terminal Disease Requirement.Jukka Varelius - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (9):663-671.
Euthanasia, Ethics, and Public Policy: An Argument Against Legalisation.John Keown - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
On an Alleged Problem for Voluntary Euthanasia.T. McConnell - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):218-219.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.