Neither Naïve nor Critical Reconstruction: Dispute Mediators, Impasse, and the Design of Argumentation

Argumentation 17 (3):265-290 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This study investigates how dispute-mediators handle impasse in the re-negotiation of divorce decrees by divorced couples. Three sources of impasse and three strategies for handling impasse are identified based on analysis of mediation transcripts. The concern here lies not so much in the disputant's arguments but in the discussion procedures dispute-mediators use to craft the disputant's argumentation into a tool to solve conflict. Their moves are understood here as a practice of reconstructing argumentative discourse that is neither naïve nor critical but reconstruction as design. Mediator's reconstruction reveals a type of communication work in contemporary societies involved in the crafting of forums and formats that mediate argumentative communication. This work is often invisible and strategic which makes its interpretation, judgment, and development a challenge for pragma-dialectical theory. How reconstruction as design can be understood is discussed by building on prior pragma-dialectical theory and research.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Persuasion dialogue in online dispute resolution.Douglas Walton & David M. Godden - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):273-295.
Yearning for certainty and the critique of medicine as “science”.Mark H. Waymack - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (3):215-229.


Added to PP

24 (#539,549)

6 months
2 (#528,188)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argument.Douglas Neil Walton - 1989 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Argumentation and social epistemology.Alvin I. Goldman - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):27-49.
Speech acts and arguments.Scott Jacobs - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):345-365.

View all 6 references / Add more references