The anthropocentric paradigm and the posibility of animal ethics

Ethics and the Environment 15 (1):pp. 27-50 (2010)
Animal ethics has presented various 'pro-animal arguments' according to which non-human animals have a more significant moral status than traditionally assumed. Although these arguments (brought forward, for instance, by Peter Singer, Tom Regan, Mary Midgley, Stephen Clark, and Mark Rowlands) have been met with various forms of criticism, a quick overview of animal ethics literature suggests that they are difficult to overcome. Pro-animal arguments seem to have consistency and argumentative support on their side. However, recently a new type of criticism has become more prominent. The claim is that the pro-animal arguments ignore the relevance of established paradigms and meanings. The moral status of animals is ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/ETE.2010.15.1.27
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,688
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Liberty and Valuing Sentient Life. Hadley - 2013 - Ethics and the Environment 18 (1):87-103.
Biophilia and Emotive Ethics: Derrida, Alice, and Animals. Bump - 2014 - Ethics and the Environment 19 (2):57.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
198 ( #25,659 of 2,237,282 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #53,952 of 2,237,282 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature