European Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):129-158 (2016)

Uygar Abaci
Pennsylvania State University
In the Critique of Pure Reason, following his elucidation of the ‘postulates’ of possibility, actuality, and necessity, Kant makes a series of puzzling remarks. He seems to deny the somewhat metaphysically intuitive contention that the extension of possibility is greater than that of actuality, which, in turn, is greater than that of necessity. Further, he states that the actual adds nothing to the possible. This leads to the view, fairly common in the literature, that Kant holds that all modal categories, in their empirical applications, are coextensive. I diverge from the common view. First, Kant is not committed to the coextensiveness thesis, understood as above. Instead, he espouses a weaker, epistemological version of the coextensiveness thesis, namely that what we can assert to be really possible is coextensive with what we cognize to be actual. Second, Kant's remarks are not intended to introduce a positive ontological thesis about the extensions of modal categories. Rather, he means to criticize a certain conception of modalities that was prevalent among his rationalist predecessors, i.e., the conception of modalities as various determinations that enter the intensions of concepts of things
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/ejop.12049
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Critique of Pure Reason.Wolfgang Schwarz - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (3):449-451.
Lectures on Logic.Immanuel Kant - 1992 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Priori Intuition and Transcendental Necessity in Kant's Idealism.Markus Kohl - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 29 (4):827-845.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant on the Necessity of Causal Relations.Toni Kannisto - 2017 - Kant-Studien 108 (4):495-516.
Kant and Strawson on the Objectivity Thesis.Patrick Fleming - 2004 - Idealistic Studies 34 (2):173-180.
Modality and Supervenience.Danilo Suster - 2000 - Acta Analytica 15:141-155.
The Modal Status of Natural Laws.Erik Andrew Anderson - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
A Kantian Critique of David Lewis's Modal Realism.Thomas Doty Eudaly - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Space, Time, Ether, and Kant.Wing-Chun Godwin Wong - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Positive Modal Logic.J. Michael Dunn - 1995 - Studia Logica 55 (2):301 - 317.
Modality and Metaphysics in Kant.Toni Kannisto - 2013 - In Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Kant-Kongresses 2010. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 633-646.


Added to PP index

Total views
132 ( #83,636 of 2,462,620 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,387 of 2,462,620 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes