Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (1):145-164 (2015)

Cheryl (C.E.) Abbate
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
In recent discussions, it has been argued that a theory of animal rights is at odds with a liberal abortion policy. In response, Francione (1995) argues that the principles used in the animal rights discourse do not have implications for the abortion debate. I challenge Francione’s conclusion by illustrating that his own framework of animal rights, supplemented by a relational account of moral obligation, can address the moral issue of abortion. I first demonstrate that Francione’s animal rights position, which grounds moral consideration in sentience, is committed to the claim that a sentient fetus has a right to life. I then illustrate that a fully developed account of animal rights that recognizes the special obligations humans have to assist animals when we cause them to be dependent and vulnerable through our voluntary actions or omissions is committed to the following: a woman also has a special obligation to assist a sentient fetus when she causes it to be dependent and vulnerable through her voluntary actions or omissions. From these considerations, it will become evident that a fully developed and consistent animal rights ethic does in fact have implications for the abortion discussion.
Keywords Abortion  Animal rights  Moral consistency  animal ethics  applied ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014, 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10677-014-9515-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.

View all 71 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Fetuses, Orphans, and a Famous Violinist.Gina Schouten - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (3):637-665.
Moral Vegetarianism.Tyler Doggett - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
251 ( #37,114 of 2,439,676 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #32,171 of 2,439,676 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes