Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2555-2599 (2020)

Abstract
This grounded study investigated the negotiation of authorship by faculty members, graduate student mentors, and their undergraduate protégés in undergraduate research experiences at a private research university in the northeastern United States. Semi-structured interviews using complementary scripts were conducted separately with 42 participants over a 3 year period to probe their knowledge and understanding of responsible authorship and publication practices and learn how faculty and students entered into authorship decision-making intended to lead to the publication of peer-reviewed technical papers. Herein the theoretical model for the negotiation of authorship developed through the analysis of these interviews is reported. The model identifies critical causal and intervening conditions responsible for the coping strategies faculty and students employ, which, in our study, appear to often produce unfortunate consequences for all involved. The undergraduate student researchers and their graduate student mentors interviewed in this study exhibited a limited understanding of authorship and the requirements for authorship in their research groups. The power differential between faculty and students, the students’ limited epistemic development, the busy-ness of the faculty, and the faculty’s failure to prioritize authorship have been identified as key factors inhibiting both undergraduate and graduate students from developing a deeper understanding of responsible authorship and publication practices. Implications for graduate education and undergraduate research are discussed, and strategies for helping all students to develop a deeper understanding of authorship are identified.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-020-00220-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Undergraduate Research Shows Potential in the BIOS 27241 Independent Cell Biology Research Lab.Danielle Rush - 2010 - Scientia: Undergraduate Research Journal for the Sciences University of Notre Dame 1 (1).
Research Ethics Education in Economics.Altug Yalcintas & Selcuk I. Sirin - 2016 - Review of Social Economy 74 (1):53 - 74.
Authorship Policies of Bioethics Journals.D. B. Resnik & Z. Master - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):424-428.
A Broader Discussion of Authorship.Dena Plemmons - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):389-398.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-15

Total views
4 ( #1,278,481 of 2,507,560 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,560 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes