The intensity of debate between the realists and antirealists shows no sign of abating. Here a new hypothesis is proposed to resolve the issue. The requirement of consistency and continuity are built-in in the methodology of this hypothesis. This new hypothesis supports realism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On Peirce’s Early Realism.Robert Lane - 2004 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40 (4):575 - 605.
Resisting the Tyranny of Terminology: The General Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science.Terence Horgan & John Tienson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):643-643.
Are Stellar Kinds Natural Kinds? A Challenging Newcomer in the Monism/Pluralism and Realism/Antirealism Debates.Stephanie Ruphy - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):1109-1120.
Consciousness and Realism.David Leech Anderson - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (1):1-17.
Why the Dynamical Hypothesis Cannot Qualify as a Law of Qualitative Structure.Nick Braisby, Richard Cooper & Bradley Franks - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):630-631.
A Realist Partner for Linda: Confirming a Theoretical Hypothesis More Than its Observational Sub-Hypothesis.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2012 - Synthese 184 (1):63-71.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #223,196 of 2,153,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,005 of 2,153,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?