Back to the future: Marriage as friendship in the thought of Mary wollstonecraft

Hypatia 14 (3):78-95 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: If liberal theory is to move forward, it must take the political nature of family relations seriously. The beginnings of such a liberalism appear in Mary Wollstonecraft's work. Wollstonecraft's depiction of the family as a fundamentally political institution extends liberal values into the private sphere by promoting the ideal of marriage as friendship. However, while her model of marriage diminishes arbitrary power in family relations, she seems unable to incorporate enduring sexual relations between married partners.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,805

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The chief inducement? The idea of marriage as friendship.Ruth Abbey & Douglas J. Den Uyl - 2001 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (1):37–52.
Odd bedfellows: Nietzsche and Mill on marriage.Ruth Abbey - 1997 - History of European Ideas 23 (2-4):81-104.
From Friendship to Marriage: Revising Kant.Lara Denis - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):1-28.
Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft.Maria J. Falco (ed.) - 1995 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Mary Astell’s theory of spiritual friendship.Nancy Kendrick - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (1):46-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
206 (#64,603)

6 months
4 (#199,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ruth Abbey
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

The Sexual Contract.Carole Pateman - 1988 - Polity Press.
The Sexual Contract.Carole Pateman - 1990 - Ethics 100 (3):658-669.
Philosophical Arguments.Charles Taylor - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (186):94-96.
Philosophy and Feminist Thinking.Eva Kittay - 1989 - Philosophical Review 98 (1):122-124.

View all 22 references / Add more references