Ethics and the Environment 20 (1):1-21 (2015)

Cheryl (C.E.) Abbate
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
In The Case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan argues that although all subjects-of-a-life have equal inherent value, there are often differences in the value of lives. According to Regan, lives that have the highest value are lives which have more possible sources of satisfaction. Regan claims that the highest source of satisfaction, which is available to only rational beings, is the satisfaction associated with thinking impartially about moral choices. Since rational beings can bring impartial reasons to bear on decision making, Regan maintains that they have an additional possible source of satisfaction that nonrational beings do not have and, consequently, the lives of rational beings turn out to have greater value..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/ethicsenviro.20.1.1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
Morals, Reason, and Animals.S. F. Sapontzis - 1987 - Temple University Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Animal Rights Pacifism.Blake Hereth - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Regan on the Lifeboat Problem: A Defense.Julian H. Franklin - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (2):189-201.
Sinking the Research Lifeboat.Susan Finsen - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):197-212.
Interests and Animal Rights.R. G. Frey - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (108):254-259.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
Fox's Critique of Animal Liberation.Tom Regan - 1978 - Ethics 88 (2):126-133.
How Should Animals Be Treated?Jack Lee - 2008 - Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (2):181 – 189.
The Justification of an Environmental Ethic.Evelyn B. Pluhar - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (1):47-61.
The Animal Rights Debate.Carl Cohen & Tom Regan - 2001 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.


Added to PP index

Total views
182 ( #55,867 of 2,439,676 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #36,433 of 2,439,676 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes