Journal of Social Philosophy 47 (2):142-170 (2016)

Authors
Cheryl (C.E.) Abbate
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Abstract
In The Case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan argues that, in addition to the negative duty not to harm nonhuman animals, moral agents have a positive duty to assist nonhuman animals who are victims of injustice. This claim is not unproblematic because, in many cases, assisting a victim of injustice requires that we harm some other nonhuman animal(s). For instance, in order to feed victims of injustice who are obligate carnivores, we must kill some other animal(s). It seems, then, that sometimes the duty to assist nonhuman animals who are victims of injustice conflicts with the prima facie duty not to harm nonhuman animals. In defense of Regan’s theory against this apparent inconsistency, I introduce an additional principle, the “guardianship principle,” which can be used to illustrate how we can be justified, under certain conditions, in overriding our prima facie duty not to harm nonhuman animals in order to fulfill our duty to assist nonhuman animals who are victims of injustice.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/josp.12146
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Animal Liberation.Bill Puka & Peter Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):557.
Practical Ethics.John Martin Fischer - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):264.
The Right and the Good.Some Problems in Ethics.W. D. Ross & H. W. B. Joseph - 1933 - Journal of Philosophy 30 (19):517-527.
Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.Alastair Norcross - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):229–245.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Victims of Injustice.President Ronald Reagan - 1991 - In D. Sank & D. Caplan (eds.), To Be a Victim. Plenum.
Responsibility for Past Injustice: How to Shift the Burden.Chandran Kukathas - 2003 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):165-190.
The Problem of Infant Suffering.Andrew Chignell - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (2):205-217.
Truth Telling as Reparations.Margaret Urban Walker - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (4):525-545.
Moral Bystanders and the Virtue of Forgiveness.Linda Radzik - 2010 - In Christopher R. Allers & Marieke Smit (eds.), Forgiveness in Perspective. Rodopi. pp. 66--69.
Historical Injustice.Duncan Ivison - 2009 - In John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig & Anne Phillips (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press.
A Critique of Hermeneutical Injustice.Laura Beeby - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):479-486.
The Priority of Solidarity to Justice.Avery Kolers - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (4):420-433.
Benefiting From Injustice and Brute Luck.Carl Knight - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (4):581-598.
Environmental Injustice in Africa.Workineh Kelbessa - 2012 - Contemporary Pragmatism 9 (1):99-132.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-08

Total views
125 ( #82,847 of 2,439,676 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #18,886 of 2,439,676 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes