Canny resemblance

Philosophical Review 118 (2):183-223 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Depiction is the form of representation distinctive of figurative paintings, drawings, and photographs. Accounts of depiction attempt to specify the relation something must bear to an object in order to depict it. Resemblance accounts hold that the notion of resemblance is necessary to the specification of this relation. Several difficulties with such analyses have led many philosophers to reject the possibility of an adequate resemblance account of depiction. This essay outlines these difficulties and argues that current resemblance accounts succumb to them. It then develops an alternative resemblance account, drawing on Grice's account of nonnatural meaning and its role in determining sentence meaning to argue that something depicts an object if it bears intention-based resemblances to the object that jointly capture its overall appearance. In addition to solving the metaphysical problem of what it is for something to depict an object, this account also sheds significant light on the epistemological issue of how we are able to work out that something depicts an object. This essay argues that our ability to work out that something depicts an object results from both our more general ability to identify intentions from the products of communicative behavior and our knowledge of stylistic conventions. This account avoids the difficulties that face rival attempts to analyze depiction in terms of resemblance. It also clarifies and explains the features that distinguish depictive from nondepictive representation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Resemblance, Restriction, and Content‐Bearing Features.John Dilworth - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1):67–70.
Depiction and convention.Ben Blumson - 2008 - Dialectica 62 (3):335-348.
Resemblance nominalism and counterparts.Alexander Bird - 2003 - Analysis 63 (3):221–228.
Pictures, colour and resemblance.Michael Newall - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):587–595.
Defining depiction.Ben Blumson - 2009 - British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (2):143-157.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-19

Downloads
223 (#56,524)

6 months
6 (#132,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Catharine Abell
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Scientific representation.Roman Frigg & James Nguyen - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Depiction, Pictorial Experience, and Vision Science.Robert Briscoe - 2016 - Philosophical Topics 44 (2):43-81.
Beyond Resemblance.Gabriel Greenberg - 2013 - Philosophical Review 122 (2):215-287.
Semantics of Pictorial Space.Gabriel Greenberg - 2021 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4):847-887.
Threefoldness.Bence Nanay - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (1):163-182.

View all 40 citations / Add more citations