Journal of Business Ethics 31 (2):107 - 116 (2001)
The empirical findings in Collins and Porras'' study of visionary companies, Built to Last, and the normative claims about the purpose of the business firm in Centesimus Annus are found to be complementary in understanding the purpose of the business firm. A summary of the methodology and findings of Built to Lastand a short overview of Catholic Social Teaching are provided. It is shown that Centesimus Annus'' claim that the purpose of the firm is broader than just profit is consistent with Collins and Porras empirical finding that firms which set a broader objective tend to be more successful than those which pursue only the maximization of profits. It is noted however that a related finding in Collins and Porras, namely that the content of the firm''s objective is not as important as internalizing some objective beyond just profit maximization, can lead to ethical myopia. Two examples are provided of this: the Walt Disney Company and Philip Morris. Centesimus Annus offers a way to expose such myopia, by providing guidance as to what the purpose of the firm is, and therefore as to what kinds of objectives are appropriate to the firm
|Keywords||business Catholic Catholic Social Teaching Centesimus Annus Christian Disney objective Philip Morris purpose vision|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Italian Economia Aziendale and Catholic Social Teaching: How to Apply the Common Good Principle at the Managerial Level. [REVIEW]Ericka Costa & Tommaso Ramus - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 106 (1):103-116.
The Common Good of Business: Addressing a Challenge Posed by «Caritas in Veritate». [REVIEW]Alejo José G. Sison & Joan Fontrodona - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 100 (S1):99-107.
Conciliating Work and Family: A Catholic Social Teaching Perspective.Gregorio Guitián - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (3):513-524.
"Just" Markets From the Perspective of Catholic Social Teaching.Nicholas J. C. Santos & Gene R. Laczniak - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):29 - 38.
Timing is Everything: Historical Contingency as a Factor in the Impact of Catholic Social Teaching Upon Managerial Practices.Richard Marens - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 57 (3):285-301.
Similar books and articles
“Ought” Implies “Can”, or, the Moral Relevance of a Theory of the Firm.John R. Danley - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):23 - 28.
The Firm as a “Community of Persons”: A Pillar of Humanistic Business Ethos. [REVIEW]Domènec Melé - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 106 (1):89-101.
The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good.Antonio Argandoña - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1093-1102.
Does Community and Environmental Responsibility Affect Firm Risk? Evidence From UK Panel Data 1994–2006.A. Salama, K. Anderson & J. S. Toms - 2011 - Business Ethics 20 (2):192-204.
The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. [REVIEW]Peter A. Stanwick & Sarah D. Stanwick - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2):195-204.
Centesimus Annus: A Critical Jewish Perspective. [REVIEW]Ronald M. Green - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (12):945-954.
Business Ethics and the Management of Non-Profit Institutions.Luk Bouckaert & Jan Vandenhove - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1073-1081.
Environmental Ethics and Information Asymmetry Among Organizational Stakeholders.Subodh P. Kulkarni - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 28 (4):215 - 228.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #122,618 of 2,132,880 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #173,424 of 2,132,880 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.