Cooperation, pervasive impact, and coercion: On the scope of distributive justice

Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (4):318–358 (2007)
Abstract
Many anticosmopolitan Rawlsians argue that since the primary subject of justice is society's basic structure, and since there is no global basic structure, the scope of justice is domestic. This paper challenges the anticosmopolitan basic structure argument by distinguishing three interpretations of what Rawls meant by the basic structure and its relation to justice, corresponding to the cooperation, pervasive impact, and coercion theories of distributive justice. On the cooperation theory, it is true that there is no global basic structure, but the basic structure turns out to be only an instrumental condition for realizing justice, and not an existence condition that must be met before demands of justice arise. On the pervasive impact and coercion theories, the basic structure is indeed an existence condition, but there exists a global basic structure. The upshot is that on any plausible interpretation of Rawls's account of the basic structure, Rawlsian justice is global in scope
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00116.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,133
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Contemporary Cosmopolitanism: Some Current Issues.Gillian Brock - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (8):689-698.
There Is No Rawlsian Theory of Corporate Governance.Abraham Singer - 2015 - Business Ethics Quarterly 25 (1):65-92.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Coercion and Justice.Laura Valentini - 2011 - American Political Science Review 105 (1):205-220.
What Makes a Basic Structure Just?Miriam Ronzoni - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (3):203-218.
The Implication of Rawls' Approach to Public Reason.Xin Liu - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (1):161-169.
The Division of Moral Labour and the Basic Structure Restriction.Thomas Porter - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (2):173-199.
How Egalitarian is Rawls's Theory of Justice?Ian Hunt - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (2):155-181.
Coercion, the Basic Structure, and the Family.Blain Neufeld - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (1):37-54.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
251 ( #14,345 of 2,191,803 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #33,142 of 2,191,803 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature