Democratic Theory and Border Coercion

Political Theory 36 (1):37-65 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question of whether or not a closed border entry policy under the unilateral control of a democratic state is legitimate cannot be settled until we first know to whom the justification of a regime of control is owed. According to the state sovereignty view, the control of entry policy, including of movement, immigration, and naturalization, ought to be under the unilateral discretion of the state itself: justification for entry policy is owed solely to members. This position, however, is inconsistent with the democratic theory of popular sovereignty. Anyone accepting the democratic theory of political legitimation domestically is thereby committed to rejecting the unilateral domestic right to control state boundaries. Because the demos of democratic theory is in principle unbounded, the regime of boundary control must be democratically justified to foreigners as well as to citizens, in political institutions in which both foreigners and citizens can participate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Immigration, Rights and Democracy.Ben Saunders - 2011 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 58 (129):58-77.
Democrazia sul confine. Libertà di movimento e sovranità popolare.Edoardo Greblo - 2015 - Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 27 (52).
Immigration, Self-Determination and the Brain Drain.Luara Ferracioli - 2015 - Review of International Studies 41 (1):99-115.
The Nature of Political Coercion: An Analysis and Justification.Wei Han - 2004 - Dissertation, The University of Connecticut
Political legitimacy in international border governance institutions.Terry Macdonald - 2015 - European Journal of Political Theory 14 (4):409-428.
The Shifting and Multiple Border and International Law.Alison Kesby - 2005 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (1):101-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-06-27

Downloads
531 (#30,787)

6 months
24 (#97,351)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arash Abizadeh
McGill University

References found in this work

Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives.Robert E. Goodin - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (1):40–68.
Aliens and Citizens.Joseph H. Carens - 1987 - Review of Politics 49 (2):251-273.
Authority and Coercion.Arthur Ripstein - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (1):2-35.

View all 13 references / Add more references