Is there a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities?

Philosophical Studies 138 (3):349 - 365 (2008)

Authors
Pablo Gilabert
Concordia University
Abstract
Samuel Scheffler has recently argued that some relationships are non-instrumentally valuable; that such relationships give rise to “underived” special responsibilities; that there is a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities; and that we must consequently strike a balance between the two. We argue that there is no such tension and propose an alternative approach to the relation between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities. First, while some relationships are non-instrumentally valuable, no relationship is unconditionally valuable. Second, whether such relationships give rise to special responsibilities is conditional on those relationships not violating certain moral constraints. Third, these moral constraints arise from within cosmopolitan egalitarianism itself. Thus the value of relationships and the special responsibilities to which they give rise arise within the parameters of cosmopolitan egalitarianism itself. The real tension is not between cosmopolitan equality and special responsibilities, but between special responsibilities and the various general duties that arise from the recognition, demanded by cosmopolitan egalitarianism, of a multiplicity of other basic goods. Indeed, even the recognition of special relationships itself gives rise to general duties that may condition and/or weigh against putative special responsibilities
Keywords Cosmopolitanism  Special responsibilities  Associative duties  Egalitarianism  Global justice
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-006-9046-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,507
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

In Defence of Cosmopolitanism.Carl Knight - 2011 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 58 (129):19-34.
Falling Into the Justice Gap? Between Duties of Social and Global Justice.Christine Straehle - 2016 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19 (6):645-661.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Liberal Nationalism and Cosmopolitan Justice.Kok-Chor Tan - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):431-461.
Egalitarianism, Ideals, and Cosmopolitan Justice.Gillian Brock - 2005 - Philosophical Forum 36 (1):1–30.
Ethics, AIDS, and Community Responsibility.John Douard - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (3).
Anencephalic Infants and Special Relationships.Nancy S. Jecker - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (4).
Cosmopolitan Communication and the Broken Dream of a Common Language.Niclas Rönnström - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (3):260-282.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
205 ( #32,361 of 2,248,581 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #125,276 of 2,248,581 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature