Is there a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities?

Philosophical Studies 138 (3):349 - 365 (2008)
Samuel Scheffler has recently argued that some relationships are non-instrumentally valuable; that such relationships give rise to “underived” special responsibilities; that there is a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities; and that we must consequently strike a balance between the two. We argue that there is no such tension and propose an alternative approach to the relation between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities. First, while some relationships are non-instrumentally valuable, no relationship is unconditionally valuable. Second, whether such relationships give rise to special responsibilities is conditional on those relationships not violating certain moral constraints. Third, these moral constraints arise from within cosmopolitan egalitarianism itself. Thus the value of relationships and the special responsibilities to which they give rise arise within the parameters of cosmopolitan egalitarianism itself. The real tension is not between cosmopolitan equality and special responsibilities, but between special responsibilities and the various general duties that arise from the recognition, demanded by cosmopolitan egalitarianism, of a multiplicity of other basic goods. Indeed, even the recognition of special relationships itself gives rise to general duties that may condition and/or weigh against putative special responsibilities
Keywords Cosmopolitanism  Special responsibilities  Associative duties  Egalitarianism  Global justice
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-006-9046-z
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,780
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Falling Into the Justice Gap? Between Duties of Social and Global Justice.Christine Straehle - 2016 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19 (6):645-661.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
186 ( #26,935 of 2,214,632 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #173,497 of 2,214,632 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature