Kierkegaardian Confessions: The Relationship Between Moral Reasoning and Failure to be Promoted [Book Review]
Journal of Business Ethics 98 (2):199 - 216 (2011)
Kierkegaard's theory of pre-ethical, aesthetic, ethical, and religious spheres of moral reasoning was applied to the case of an individual rejected for promotion to full professor. The evaluators seemed to represent the public morality of the profession, assumed that they represented the highest level of moral reasoning, and judged that the candidate represented a private morality based on a lower level of moral reasoning. The article questioned the view that moral reasoning could be discerned from one's actions. It was paradoxical that different spheres seemed to produce similar kinds of actions, though for differing reasons, making identification difficult. It was easy for the evaluators to confuse spheres representing private moralities and to conclude, based on the candidate's research record, that she/he was unsuitable for promotion. It was equally difficult for the candidate to discern whether the evaluators' moral reasoning represented the public morality of the profession, or a pre-ethical need by the evaluators to appear in solidarity with the public morality. This made it difficult for the candidate to know whether the evaluators' recommendations represented absolute standards that would be applied to any future re-application, or not. The article's contribution was the identification of different spheres of moral reasoning, the interactions between spheres, and the paradoxical indeterminacy of gauging moral reasoning from moral action. It supported Kierkegaard's view that the highest truth attainable by an individual was "an objective uncertainty" and that this truth was lost in self-deception when one claimed to have been able to solve the paradox
|Keywords||aesthetics ethics identity Kierkegaard Knight of Faith Knight of Infinite Resignation moral reasoning personality promotion public versus private morality Scheler|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments.Søren Kierkegaard - 1992 - Princeton University Press.
The Nature of Sympathy.Max Scheler, Peter Heath & W. Stark - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (4):671-673.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Principled Moral Reasoning: Is It a Viable Approach to Promote Ethical Integrity? [REVIEW]James Weber & Sharon Green - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (5):325 - 333.
Tolerance and Moral Reasoning Among Adolescents in Ireland.Ann Breslin - 1982 - Journal of Moral Education 11 (2):112-127.
Resolving a Moral Conflict Through Discourse.Warren French & David Allbright - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2):177-194.
The Nature of Moral Reasoning: The Framework and Activities of Ethical Deliberation, Argument, and Decision-Making.Stephen Cohen - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers.Robbin Derry - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (11):855 - 862.
Moral Reasoning: Hints and Allegations.Joseph M. Paxton & Joshua D. Greene - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):511-527.
Managers' Moral Reasoning: Evidence From Large Indian Manufacturing Organisations. [REVIEW]Manjit Monga - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 71 (2):179 - 194.
Moral Reasoning as a Determinant of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Study in the Public Accounting Profession. [REVIEW]John J. Ryan - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (3):233 - 244.
Is the Emotional Dog Wagging its Rational Tail, or Chasing It?Cordelia Fine - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):83 – 98.
Added to index2010-07-07
Total downloads16 ( #299,413 of 2,172,021 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #173,295 of 2,172,021 )
How can I increase my downloads?