Rejoinder to 'medicine as patriarchal religion'

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (3):313-318 (1984)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/9.3.313
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,767
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Response to Professor Rawlinson.Fredrick R. Abrams - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (3):325-326.
That Old‐Time Religion: Rejoinder to Narveson.Don Herzog - 1991 - Critical Review 5 (4):583-584.
Medical Fallibility: A Rejoinder.Samuel Gorovitz - 1978 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 3 (3):187-191.
Why Science: A Rejoinder.Daniel L. Creson - 1978 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 3 (3):256-261.
The Religious Features of Scientific Medicine.Harold Y. Vanderpool - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):pp. 203-234.
Patriarchy and the Protestant Conscience: A Critique.Guy B. Hammond - 1981 - Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (1):84 - 102.
Women, Medicine, and Religion: A Response to Raymond and Abrams.Mary C. Rawlinson - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (3):321-324.
Medicine as Patriarchal Religion.Janice G. Raymond - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (2):197-216.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

19 ( #249,327 of 2,146,939 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #385,507 of 2,146,939 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums