Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):219 – 225 (1990)
An examination of Ian Parker's definitions of discourse reveals them to be non-distinctive and of limited utility. It is argued that discourse analysis should be integrated with, rather than set against, social psychology. Discourse analysts should attend to the issues of the representativeness and generality of their evidence, should be wary of attributing causality to discourse, and should consider the advantages of systematically investigating, rather than asserting, the social consequences of the use of different discourses
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Cutting Cakes: A Study of Psychologists' Social Categorisations.Jonathan Potter - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):17 – 33.
Citations of this work BETA
The "Boomerang" Effect of Radicalism in Discursive Psychology: A Critical Overview of the Controversy with the Social Representations Theory.Annamaria Silvana de Rosa - 2006 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 36 (2):161–201.
Real Things: Discourse, Context and Practice.Ian Parker - 1990 - Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):227 – 233.
Similar books and articles
Commodification or Compensation: A Reply to Ketchum.H. M. Malm - 1989 - Hypatia 4 (3):128-135.
Shifting Frames: From Divided to Distributed Psychologies of Scientific Agents.Peter J. Taylor - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304-310.
From 1984 to One-Dimensional Man: Critical Reflections on Orwell and Marcuse.Douglas Kellner - unknown
A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms.P. X. Monaghan - 2010 - Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
Added to index2009-03-08
Total downloads22 ( #222,866 of 2,152,501 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #225,818 of 2,152,501 )
How can I increase my downloads?