The context of discourse: Let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater

Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):219 – 225 (1990)
An examination of Ian Parker's definitions of discourse reveals them to be non-distinctive and of limited utility. It is argued that discourse analysis should be integrated with, rather than set against, social psychology. Discourse analysts should attend to the issues of the representativeness and generality of their evidence, should be wary of attributing causality to discourse, and should consider the advantages of systematically investigating, rather than asserting, the social consequences of the use of different discourses
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089008573000
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,173
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Mind, Self and Society.G. H. Mead - forthcoming - Chicago, Il.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Real Things: Discourse, Context and Practice.Ian Parker - 1990 - Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):227 – 233.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

22 ( #222,866 of 2,152,501 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #225,818 of 2,152,501 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums