Medical Humanities 28 (2):92-96 (2002)

Abstract
If Hamlet had not delayed his revenge there would have been no play. Many explanations of the delay have been offered in the last four centuries. None is convincing. The interpretation which best fits the evidence best is that Hamlet was suffering from an acute depressive illness, with some obsessional features. He could not make a firm resolve to act. In Shakespeare’s time there was no concept of acute depressive illness, although melancholy was well known. Melancholy, however, would have been seen as a character defect. In the tragic model the hero brings himself and others to ruin because of a character defect. Thus, at the time, the play conformed to the tragic model. With today’s knowledge, it does not. This analysis adds to, but does not replace, other insights into the play
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/mh.28.2.92
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,156
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mother and Son.John Decarlo - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 6 (14):51-60.
Delayed-Choice Experiments and the Metaphysics of Entanglement.Matthias Egg - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (9):1124-1135.
Burali-Forti's Revenge.Stewart Shapiro - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Field on Revenge.Agustin Rayo & Philip Welch - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Revenge and Context.Keith Simmons - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Bradwardine's Revenge.Stephen Read - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Revenge, Field, and ZF.Graham Priest - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press. pp. 225.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
42 ( #240,530 of 2,411,745 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #121,775 of 2,411,745 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes