On evidence: A reply to bar-Hillel and Margalit

Mind 90 (357):108-112 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/mind/xc.357.108

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

In defence of the classical notion of evidence.Maya Bar-Hillel & Avishai Margalit - 1979 - Mind 88 (352):576-583.
Yehoshua Bar-Hillel. Comments on ‘Degree of confirmation’ by Professor K. R. Popper. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 155–157. - Karl R. Popper. ‘Content’ and ‘degree of confirmation’: A reply to Dr Bar-Hillel. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 157–163. - Rudolf Carnap. Remarks on Popper's note on content and degree of confirmation. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 243–244. - K. R. Popper. Reply to Professor Carnap. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 244–245. - Y. Bar-Hillel. Further comments on probability and confirmation. A rejoinder to Professor Popper. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 245–248. - K.R.Popper. Adequacy and consistency: A second reply to Dr Bar-Hillel. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 249–256. - Peter Achinstein. The identity hypothesis. The British Journal for the philosophy of science,. [REVIEW]Harry V. Stopes-Roe - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):142-146.
Expecting the unexpected.Avishai Margalit & Maya Bar-Hillel - 1983 - Philosophia 13 (3-4):263-288.
To err is human.Maya Bar-Hillel & Avishai Margalit - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (2):246-248.
How vicious are cycles of intransitive choice?Maya Bar-Hillel & Avishai Margalit - 1988 - Theory and Decision 24 (2):119-145.
The irrational, the unreasonable, and the wrong.Avishai Margalit & Maya Bar-Hillel - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):346-349.
Meaning and Use.A. Margalit (ed.) - 1979 - Reidel.
Newcomb’s Paradox Revisited.Maya Bar-Hillel & Avishai Margalit - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (4):295-304.
Gideon's paradox — a paradox of rationality.Maya Bar-Hillel & Avishai Margalit - 1985 - Synthese 63 (2):139 - 155.
Y. Bar-Hillel. Comment on the first issue of MULL, MULL, vol. 59 no. D , p. 50. - Patricia James. Reply to Bar-Hillel. MULL, vol. 59 no. D , pp. 50–51. [REVIEW]W. W. Waddell - 1964 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (1):47.
The Scientific Enterprise: The Bar-Hillel Colloquium: Studies in History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science.Edna Ullmann-Margalit - 2012 - Springer.
David-Hillel Ruben’s 'Traditions and True Successors': A Critical Reply.John N. Williams - 2013 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (7):40-45.
Avashai Margalit and Theology of Institutions.Nathaniel Adam Warne - 2022 - Studies in Christian Ethics 35 (3):607-621.
Causal over-determination: Resolution of a puzzle.Ruth Gavison, Avishai Margalit & Edna Ullmann-Margalit - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (4):381 - 390.
On evidence: A reply to McGrew.Peter Achinstein - 1997 - Analysis 57 (1):81–83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#379,234)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Achinstein
Johns Hopkins University

Citations of this work

Subjective and objective confirmation.Patrick Maher - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (2):149-174.
Entitlement and misleading evidence.Jeremy Fantl - 2022 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3):743-761.
Carnap and Achinstein on evidence.Frederick M. Kronz - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 67 (2):151 - 167.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references