“Some Things in Them Hard to Understand”: Reflections on an Approach to Paul
Interpretation 38 (3):254-267 (1984)
Abstract
Because Paul has proven difficult to understand, the interpreter must pay careful attention to the language, the rhetorical structure, and the context if unnecessary difficulties are to be avoidedDOI
10.1177/002096438403800304
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Pauline Approach to Ethical Decision-Making.John F. Kilner - 1989 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 43 (4):366-379.
Luke’s Political Vision.Loveday Alexander - 2012 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 66 (3):283-293.
Explaining Consciousness: A (Very) Different Approach to the “Hard Problem”.Paul F. Cunningham - 2013 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 34 (1):41-62.
Peter-Paul Verbeek, what things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency and design.Katinka Waelbers - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):275-277.
“The Last Enemy Is Death”: Paul and the Pastoral Task.Charles E. Brown - 1989 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 43 (4):380-392.
A Structuralist Approach to Paul's Old Testament Hermeneutic.Dan O. Via - 1974 - Interpretation 28 (2):201-220.
Review of Peter-Paul Verbeek, What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. [REVIEW]Albert Borgmann - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (8).
What's in a Name?: Reflections on Language, Magic, and Religion.George Albert Wells - 1993 - Open Court.
Let’s Make Things Better: A Reply to My Readers. [REVIEW]Peter-Paul Verbeek - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (2):251 - 261.
Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of Paul Auster's In the Country of Last Things.Niall Lucy - 2009 - Angelaki 14 (2):21-28.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-24
Downloads
16 (#669,635)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
2013-11-24
Downloads
16 (#669,635)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
Historical graph of downloads
