Pratidhwani the Echo (I):89-94 (2012)

Abstract
A group of Indian Historians described the Revolt of 1857 as people’s revolt and regarded its leaders as national Hero’s. Further, some Indian and British Historians have termed the Revolt of 1857 as the ‘Mutiny of the Sepoys’. Opinion differs among the Historians as to the nature of the Great Revolt of 1857. I am trying to continue my brief discussion from this background in this essay.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Great Satraps' Revolt. [REVIEW]Simon Hornblower - 1990 - The Classical Review 40 (2):363-365.
Marx, Engels, and the Ethics of Violence in Revolt.Nick Hewlett - 2012 - The European Legacy 17 (7):882-898.
Comunidad política y revuelta popular.Guillermo Pereyra - 2012 - Signos Filosóficos 14 (27):119-146.
Antonio Ungar: razonador sensible de la experiencia contemporánea.Paula Andrea Marín Colorado - 2011 - Logos: Revista de la Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades 19:11-22.
Heidegger y la ética.Arturo Gerardo Ruiz Utrilla - 2012 - Signos Filosóficos 14 (27):177-182.
Critique Today: The University and Literature Around 1968.Christoph König - 2008 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2008 (144):173-179.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-18

Total views
410 ( #17,700 of 2,411,338 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #44,699 of 2,411,338 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes