Throwing the normative baby out with the prescriptivist bathwater

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):249-249 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is neither desirable nor possible to eliminate normative concerns from the psychology of reasoning. Norms define the most fundamental psychological questions: What are people trying to do, and how? Even if no one system of reasoning can be the norm, pure descriptivism is as undesirable and unobtainable in the psychology of reasoning as elsewhere in science

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,764

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comment on disessa.William J. Clancey - 1994 - Cognition and Instruction 12 (2):97-102.
Traditional Catholic philosophy: baby and bathwater.James Franklin - 2006 - In Michael Whelan (ed.), Issues for Church and Society in Australia. Sydney, Australia: St Pauls. pp. 15-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
40 (#343,814)

6 months
4 (#314,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Patterns of discovery.Norwood Russell Hanson - 1958 - Cambridge [Eng.]: University Press.
Critique of pure reason.Immanuel Kant - 1781/1998 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.

View all 7 references / Add more references